sPHENIX MAPS tracker discussion

[Jakub Kvapil <jakub.kvapil AT cern.ch>]

Dear all,

Sorry I am on a school and will miss the meeting.

From the online monitoring I see there is additional 8 noisy pixels (above 10^-6) from the current mask. 1 in layer 1 is active every strobe.

Best regards

Jakub

---

From: sPHENIX-MAPS-l <sphenix-maps-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Mengel, Tanner Austin via sPHENIX-MAPS-l <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 10:30 AM
To: sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Sphenix-maps-l] FHR analysis update

 

Hi All,

 

I will miss the general meeting today due to a time conflict, but I wanted to keep everyone updated on the FHR analysis. I have been working with Yasser and Jo on finding the optimal noisy pixel mask for the 2024 data. I’ve included some brief slides showing the status.

 

Link to a shell analysis note:
https://www.overleaf.com/6914977361pgszgkdzmbht#76eb79

 

Link to GitHub repository:

https://github.com/tmengel/MvtxCalibration

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. I will be there next week, and I can go over this in more detail.

 

Best,

 

Tanner Mengel

Graduate Research Assistant

University of Tennesse, Knoxville

 

Email: tmengel AT vols.utk.edu

Mobile: (214)-534-8158

 

Nielsen Physics Building, 401

1408 Circle Drive

Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.