sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX MAPS tracker discussion
List archive
- From: Hao-Ren Jheng <hrjheng AT mit.edu>
- To: "dloom AT umich.edu" <dloom AT umich.edu>
- Cc: SPHENIX MVTX <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Joe Osborn <osbornjd91 AT gmail.com>
- Subject: [[Sphenix-maps-l] ] MVTX QA & run quality check
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:47:05 +0000
Hi Devon,
Thank you for looking into the MVTX QA!
Over the summer, I set up a semi-automatic MVTX run quality check that analyzes cluster QAs from fast production and publishes a daily updated list on this webpage:: https://sphenix-intra.sdcc.bnl.gov/WWW/user/hjheng/Run2024/MvtxQA-Summary/.
Sorry for not coordinating with you earlier — I’ve been occupied with other tasks and didn’t get a chance to share this in the tracking meeting.
The criteria I set to classify runs as good/OK/bad is primarily based on the fit quality to the cluster phi distribution and the probability of a high chip occupancy, which are different from yours. I think combining our criteria we could have a comprehensive
and complete set of good runs that are useful for tracking-related analyses.
Let me know what you think and how I could help!
Best,
Hao-Ren
-
[[Sphenix-maps-l] ] MVTX QA & run quality check,
Hao-Ren Jheng, 12/18/2024
-
Re: [[Sphenix-maps-l] ] MVTX QA & run quality check,
Devon Loomis, 12/18/2024
- Re: [[Sphenix-maps-l] ] MVTX QA & run quality check, Hao-Ren Jheng, 12/20/2024
-
Re: [[Sphenix-maps-l] ] MVTX QA & run quality check,
Devon Loomis, 12/18/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.