sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX discussion of physics
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] QM poster abstract about the sPHENIX DAQ++
- From: Edouard Kistenev <kistenev AT bnl.gov>
- To: Martin Purschke <purschke AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] QM poster abstract about the sPHENIX DAQ++
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:09:27 -0400
Marting, nice abstract (will keep a copy). One comment only. SiPM’s are not
sampling devices, they are not “sampling the calorimeter signals”. Otherwise
I really like the abstract.
Edward
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Martin Purschke <purschke AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm planning to submit the attached poster abstract for the QM.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
>
> --
> Martin L. Purschke, Ph.D. ; purschke AT bnl.gov
> ; http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/~purschke
> ;
> Brookhaven National Laboratory ; phone: +1-631-344-5244
> Physics Department Bldg 510 C ; fax: +1-631-344-3253
> Upton, NY 11973-5000 ; skype: mpurschke
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> <abstract.txt>_______________________________________________
> Sphenix-physics-l mailing list
> Sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-physics-l
-
[Sphenix-physics-l] QM poster abstract about the sPHENIX DAQ++,
Martin Purschke, 09/26/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] QM poster abstract about the sPHENIX DAQ++, Edouard Kistenev, 09/26/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.