sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX discussion of physics
List archive
- From: "Perepelitsa, Dennis" <dvp AT bnl.gov>
- To: "sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Sphenix-physics-l] Physics Roundup - May 2022
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 01:19:28 +0000
Dear sPHENIX colleagues,
Although we have had some significant physics discussion in last week’s Collaboration Meeting and then Summer School, I wanted to keep up the tradition of this monthly mailing.
For this month, I’d like to highlight the recent ATLAS dijet asymmetry measurement:
ATLAS, Measurements of the suppression and correlations of dijets in Pb+Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 5.02 TeV, INSPIRE link, sub. PRC
The paper reports distributions of xJ = subleading jet pT / leading jet pT in AA events compared to that in p+p. This observable plays a special role in the history of heavy ion physics at the LHC, given the first observation of a dijet asymmetry
in Pb+Pb collisions way back in 2010.
Since these measurement are sensitive to the energy loss of both jets, they are often framed as a useful way to probe the interplay between the (1) path-length dependence of energy loss (in general, the path lengths seen by the two jets are anti-correlated,
perhaps resulting in a higher rate of unbalanced configurations), and (2) the relative magnitude of the jet-by-jet fluctuations in the energy loss process (which would affect both jets incoherently, potentially favoring a flatter distribution). As a technical
note, the measurement is fully corrected for the pT bin migration of both jets, requiring a challenging, so-called “2-D”, unfolding.
As a specific advance over previous measurements, this paper reports not just per-pair-normalized xJ distributions, but really the absolute two-jet cross-section in p+p collisions, and its analogue in Pb+Pb collisions. Doing this reveals that
the change in the xJ distribution is driven by the suppression of balanced configurations, with the rate of unbalanced configurations staying very similar in Pb+Pb as in p+p. I would be curious if somebody has a picture of what this implies about the physics…
Dennis
- [Sphenix-physics-l] Physics Roundup - May 2022, Perepelitsa, Dennis, 05/31/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.