sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX discussion of physics
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] First Draft of My Talk at QNP 2022: The sPHENIX Open and Close Heavy Flavor Program
- From: "Huang, Jin" <jhuang AT bnl.gov>
- To: Zhaozhong Shi <zzshi AT mit.edu>, "Dean, Cameron" <cdean AT bnl.gov>, "Hideki Okawa" <Hideki.Okawa AT cern.ch>
- Cc: "sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] First Draft of My Talk at QNP 2022: The sPHENIX Open and Close Heavy Flavor Program
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 19:00:49 +0000
|
Dear Zhaozhong
Thanks for sharing your slides draft well ahead of the talk. This is very helpful!
Please note on the agenda you have 25min, which suggest you can add about five more slides.
A few more suggestions:
Please update the slides and share with the email list again.
Cheers
Jin
______________________________
Jin HUANG
Physicist, Ph.D. Brookhaven National Laboratory Physics Department, Bldg 510 C Upton, NY 11973-5000
Office: 631-344-5898 Cell: 757-604-9946 ______________________________
From: Zhaozhong Shi <zzshi AT mit.edu>
Dear sPHENIX HF Topic Group,
I have just quickly taken all the comments from Cameron and Hideki and produced a new draft posted in the following link:
Any further comments or suggestions will be appreciated. I will keep updating over the next week when I am available. But it looks like the QNP 2022 still does not have an agent yet. I assume this is a standard 15-minute parallel talk. Thank you very much!
Sincerely, Zhaozhong Shi
------------------------------------------- Zhaozhong Shi, PhD Director's Postdoctoral Fellow P-3: Nuclear and Particle Physics and Application Los Alamos National Laboratory TA-53 Building 1 A106 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 ------------------------------------------- From: Dean, Cameron <cdean AT bnl.gov>
Hi Zhaozhong,
Thanks for the slides, I think the talk looks good and my main points are minor things like updating plots and thinking about what points to stress. I was copying down notes as Hideki sent his comments and I think we overlapped a little but find my suggestions below.
Cheers, Cameron
In general, I would say you want to emphasise that sPHENIX is both complimentary to the LHC experiments and can probe regions that the LHC can't. Also, you seem to be missing citations, you can link to our public notes on our indico pages.
Slide 2 - The sPHENIX picture is out of date, there is no mention of the TPOT, sEPD, MBD or ZDC. Ross Corliss showed an an updated figure, https://indico.bnl.gov/event/16174/
Slide 3 - I think this road map is too complicated and also a bit out of date. You could probably make your own timeline that looks over what we achieved this year and what will be done for the next few years. So you can say that the HCals are in, we're inserting the EMCal, trackers are constructed etc.
Slide 4 - The INTT picture is out of date as they've completed the construction of at least the first 2 layers of 4. Also, the INTT has ladders instead of staves. You can get a good INTT picture from my AUM talk https://indico.bnl.gov/event/16163/
Slide 5 - I think this is a slide you can be very enthusisatic about. For the MVTX picture, you could show the two completed halves here instead of on eof hte half layers before cabling. You could say the LBL CMM showed stave placement to < 50 microns. Instead of the 8-stave telescope, you could say we'll be stress-testing the system before data taking, we'll be taking cosmic data for alignment etc.
Slide 6 - You should update the link to the 2022 BUP, currently it links to the 2020 BUP. https://indico.bnl.gov/event/15845/attachments/40963/68517/sPHENIX_Beam_Use_Proposal_2022.pdf
Slide 8 - A grey line appeared on my PDF between the detector sketch-up and the tracking diagram. Also on this slide, you could verbally mention that the MVTX gives precision vertexing, the INTT discriminates the beam crossing and the TPC gives the main momentum measurement so all three trackers compliment each other.
Slide 9 - Slide looks good. In case a question comes up, the low pT reach of the B is related to the low pT reconstruction of the D candidate. I would maybe remove the last bullet point, we might not want to promise measurements to early in case it gives the wrong impression.
Slide 10 - You should update the right hand figure with a higher resolution picture, https://indico.bnl.gov/event/10004/attachments/31207/49253/sPH-HF-2019-001.pdf
Slide 14 - We have an updated R_AA projection with the Upsilon(3S). You could also take a moment here to consider the CMS results from QM22 and how we fit into the picture.
|
-
Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] First Draft of My Talk at QNP 2022: The sPHENIX Open and Close Heavy Flavor Program,
Huang, Jin, 09/05/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] First Draft of My Talk at QNP 2022: The sPHENIX Open and Close Heavy Flavor Program,
Shi, Zhaozhong, 09/05/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] First Draft of My Talk at QNP 2022: The sPHENIX Open and Close Heavy Flavor Program, Zhaozhong Shi, 09/08/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] First Draft of My Talk at QNP 2022: The sPHENIX Open and Close Heavy Flavor Program, Zhaozhong Shi, 09/06/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] First Draft of My Talk at QNP 2022: The sPHENIX Open and Close Heavy Flavor Program,
Shi, Zhaozhong, 09/05/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.