Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-software-l - [Sphenix-software-l] update on CD-1 review draft jet performance plots

sphenix-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX discussion of software

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Perepelitsa, Dennis" <dvp AT bnl.gov>
  • To: "sphenix-jet-structure-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-jet-structure-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: [Sphenix-software-l] update on CD-1 review draft jet performance plots
  • Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:18:45 +0000

Hi all,

As promised in the Jet Structure meeting on Monday, please find some slides
with a mid-week update.

Key points:

1. The strange JER in pp collisions arises from an aspect of the HI-style jet
reconstruction. The minimum seed jet pT, which essentially sets how
permissive is the identification of jet-like regions to exclude from the
background determination, was chosen to be quite large. This can result in a
“self-energy” bias for low-pT jets, in which their energies are included in
the background determination, causing a systematically low response. This
resulted in a double-peak structure in the response distributions, first
noticed by Jeff, arising from jets which do / do not have a seed jet nearby.

While in Au+Au events, it makes sense to have a somewhat high minimum seed
jet pT (so that one does not accidentally exclude background fluctuations —
although just where to set it is still an open question), this is clearly too
high for p+p collisions. I will rerun some p+p MC with a lower seed jet pT
threshold, although that will mean that we SHOULD expect some difference in
the mean pT response between pp and Au+Au at low-jet-pT.

I’d be particularly happy for input on this point.

2. I have updated the dijet xJ plot with full statistics, and I have made two
versions: one with small cone size and high-pT where there is no appreciable
centrality-dependence in the reco-level distribution, and one with large cone
size / small-pT where there is. This followed from a nice suggestion by Aaron
(who also had other suggestions I have not yet gotten to).

3. The photon+jet simulations have finished and Kurt Hill, a student at
Colorado, has made some xJg distributions in the same spirit as the dijet xJ
distributions, again showing a case where one can / cannot observe a
centrality-dependence in the reco-level distribution.

Happy for any feedback — will keep working towards the presentation of these
at the General Meeting,

Dennis

Dennis V. Perepelitsa
Assistant Professor, Physics Department
University of Colorado Boulder


Attachment: dvp-sPHENIX-update-4-18-18.pdf
Description: dvp-sPHENIX-update-4-18-18.pdf




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page