sphenix-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Sphenix-tpc-l mailing list
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-tpc-l] First realistic idea of TPC readout pad configuration
- From: Thomas K Hemmick <hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>
- To: Takao Sakaguchi <takao AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: sphenix-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tpc-l] First realistic idea of TPC readout pad configuration
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 12:07:11 -0500
Me too. I also admit that after chatting with you and Jin on another thread that the FELIX board seems to be just a fantastic match for our needs. Time to get psyched!
Tom
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Takao Sakaguchi <takao AT bnl.gov> wrote:
TakaoHi Tom,I see. I agree that we place 16 pads in radial direction for each R segmentregardless of the radial width.
I think it is fine. Also, I think this design concept is enough for CD-1 review.On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Thomas K Hemmick <hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu> wrote:Hi TakaoI have a minor disagreement with this figure. The statements like 20-40, 40-60, and 60-80 are all ROUND numbers. They are not really exact numbers of cm. For this reason, dropping the number of pad rows in the outer-most module is not correct. There will be 16 radial segments in every module. Each module will be LESS than 20 cm, but they will all be equal size. Furthermore, we still need to leave a little room for services (like gas in/out and laser in/out) and so even taking 78-20cm and dividing by three is a little bit too big.This, the correct segmentation is the slightly larger on that was suggested on the spreadsheet at the end of our December meeting.OPTION 1:R1: 6 cards/R1 * 12 R1/end * 2 end/TPC = 144 cards/TPCR2: 8 cards/R2 * 12 R2/end * 2 end/TPC = 192 cardsTPCR3: 12 cards/R3 * 12 R3/end * 2 end/TPC = 288 cards/TPCTOTAL = 624 cards/TPC * 8 SAMPA/card = 4992 SAMPA/TPC * 32 channels/SAMPA = 159,744 channels/TPCOPTION 2:R1: 5 cards/R1 * 12 R1/end * 2 end/TPC = 120 cards/TPCR2: 8 cards/R2 * 12 R2/end * 2 end/TPC = 192 cardsTPCR3: 12 cards/R3 * 12 R3/end * 2 end/TPC = 288 cards/TPCTOTAL = 600 cards/TPC * 8 SAMPA/card = 4800 SAMPA/TPC * 32 channels/SAMPA = 153,600 channels/TPCOne should note that, even though we will have 48 channels in radius, we will only include 40 radial channels in the datastream. This is VERY VERY close to what we have been talking about thus far as being 30 radial segments. The wiring of 30 segments would have been a NIGHTMARE and now it is a dream, so this is a very good compromise.TomOn Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Takao Sakaguchi <takao AT bnl.gov> wrote:_______________________________________________Dear All,Tom, Klaus and I had a discussion on the readout pad
configuration for the TPC on Wednesday, and converged intoa sort of realistic configuration, which nicely matches theFEE card configuration.I here tried to illustrate in a drawing with some explanationand a channel count as attached. Currently, if we fullyinstrument pads down to 20cm for both sides, the numberof readout pads will be ~150K and the number of FEE cardswill be 600. which is ~50% more than the reported values.Given the good price of DAM and EBDC modules, we maybe able to accommodate this channel increase.Here is some detail info in the pad configuration.Right now, our engineers designed the pad plane supportstructure in the unit of 30 degree in phi and 20cm radiuswidth. So, we tried to place pads in multiple of of the numberof channels of a FEE card, which is 256 channels.In this manner, we set the radius length of the pads as12.5mm so that the 16 pads will be in line in radius directionin 20cm radius width.In phi direction, the number of pads will also be multiple of16, so that the number of pads in a give sector will bemultiple of 256. The pad size will change as a function ofradius in a given sector.In this configuration, we place 5, 8 and 12 FEE cards in agiven sector for 20<r<40, 40<r<60, and 60<r<78cm radiusregions, respectively.The most outer ~20cm ring will be 18cm indeed, so, theeach FEE will handle 14*16 instead of 16*16 channels.We could work out to minimize the free channel of theFEE card.I'll work on the configuration of the FEE card for this caseas well as the expected data rate from each FEE card soon.Have a happy holiday!Takao
--Takao Sakaguchi
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Physics Department, Bldg. 510C
takao AT bnl.gov
Office: 1-631-344-3345
Sphenix-tpc-l mailing list
Sphenix-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tpc-l
--Takao Sakaguchi
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Physics Department, Bldg. 510C
takao AT bnl.gov
Office: 1-631-344-3345
-
Re: [Sphenix-tpc-l] First realistic idea of TPC readout pad configuration,
Thomas K Hemmick, 01/05/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-tpc-l] First realistic idea of TPC readout pad configuration,
Takao Sakaguchi, 01/06/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-tpc-l] First realistic idea of TPC readout pad configuration, Thomas K Hemmick, 01/06/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-tpc-l] First realistic idea of TPC readout pad configuration,
Takao Sakaguchi, 01/06/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.