Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-tracking-l - [Sphenix-tracking-l] Field mapping in place

sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>
  • To: "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Field mapping in place
  • Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 23:20:36 -0400

When we put together the sPHENIX schedule a year ago, one issue that came up was magnetic field mapping. The problem for the schedule is that one can't really do a meaningful field map until the solenoid is inserted in the Outer HCAL which serves as the flux return, and as we plan to cool down the solenoid with the RHIC cryogenic plant, one couldn't really do a field map until the detector is almost complete, at which time one imagines we would be shit hot to put the tracking system inside and start trying to run the experiment.

I haven't spent the time to analyze it through thoroughly, but I suspect that we may not need to do a dedicated field mapping campaign. I wonder if we could get away with building some number of field probes into the tracking detectors and relying on calculation of the field from those probes. I imagined some number of probes (8?) at the outer radius if the TPC at either end in z, and perhaps additional probes at the inner radius, or attached to the vertex tracker. They could be surveyed in place during construction. With, say, 32 measurements of the field, do we have enough information about the field?

Since PHENIX was built, a number of small 3D Hall probes have become available; for example these:

http://www.senis.ch/magnetometer/hall-probes/integrated-hall-probes

or some very nifty ones that Achim came across:

http://www.metrolab.com/products/magvector-mv2/

I have also been in touch with a group at NSLS II that have developed a calibration device for Hall sensors:

http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/pac2013/papers/thpac14.pdf

which is apparently still functional at BNL which we could uses.

There even seems to me to be some advantages to doing the "mapping" as we start up, since one can directly measure the field as the detector is installed, and in the case of a TPC, one could be measuring the magnetic field of the TPC and aligning B with E during the detector commissioning.

Thoughts?

--
John Haggerty
email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
cell: 631 741 3358




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page