Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-tracking-l - Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Seeding/Tracking Efficiency

sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Morrison <dave.patrick.morrison AT gmail.com>
  • To: Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>, sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Seeding/Tracking Efficiency
  • Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:56:39 -0400

Hi Christof,

That looks very encouraging – and makes sense too.

Dave

On 4/28/17 9:50 AM, Christof Roland wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I had a look at the seeding/tracking efficiency.
>
> As suspected in the last meeting it turns out that the seeding layers are
> not really hermetic.
> Especially the INTT layers are not 100% efficient, which is probably to be
> expected.
> This in turn means the the current seeding requirement of 8 out of 8 layers
> hit is
> responsible for a large part of the inefficiency we saw in the kalman
> tracking.
>
> Releasing the number of hit requirement in the seeding step from 8 out of 8
> to
> 6 out of 8 hits increases the single track reconstruction efficiency from
> ~86% to ~98%
>
> Please see the attached plots below.
>
> In the region below 1 GeV the 6 out of 8 seeding scheme results in some
> segmentation
> violations. We'll have to take a look at that.
>
> Cheers
>
> Christof
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sPHENIX-tracking-l mailing list
> sPHENIX-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page