Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-tracking-l - [Sphenix-tracking-l] Upsilon signal fractions

sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT cea.fr>
  • To: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Tony Frawley <frawley AT fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu>
  • Subject: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Upsilon signal fractions
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:35:12 -0700

Hi Tony, others,

following on today's discussion at the Distortion Software meeting, I calculated the fractions of the upsilon signal that goes into the tails and Gaussian core. The result is "interesting".

For the nominal signal (no distortion) you get:

 core: 6%
 left tail: 93%
 right tail: 1%

And for the signal after distortion + reconstruction:

Fractions:
 core: 4%
 left tail: 93%
 right tail: 3%

So in both cases the "gaussian core" fraction is actually very small. The signal is dominated by the left side power law. I think this makes sense because when the resolution is good, what dominates the distribution is really the radiative decays of the upsilons. This is also illustrated in the two attached plots, where the vertical lines represent when the function switches from power law to Gaussian (on either sides). Note that, according to the fit a significant fraction of the signal also goes beyond the left limit of the plot (m < 7 GeV/c2).

As for the actual difference between nominal and distortion+reconstruction, it lies in the right tail mostly, which grows from 1% to 3% of the total signal.

Comments welcome,


Hugo



Attachment: InvMassUpsilon_cb2_upsilon_truth_micromegas_nominal.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Attachment: InvMassUpsilon_cb2_upsilon_truth_micromegas_corrected_mm-new-loose_extrapolated.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document



  • [Sphenix-tracking-l] Upsilon signal fractions, Hugo Pereira Da Costa, 01/19/2021

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page