sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance
- From: Gunther M Roland <rolandg AT mit.edu>
- To: Jamie Nagle <jamie.nagle AT colorado.edu>
- Cc: "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:08:53 +0000
>
> * Some of the current momentum resolution / upsilon resolution plots look
> like that program is lost (or never was). It is possible to produce a
> figure of (1) charged particle momentum resolution versus p up to 50 GeV,
> and (2) upsilon 3-state mass resolution for the following equivalent rates:
> 1 kHz, 10 kHz, 25 kHz, 50 kHz. At what rate do the effects of degraded
> resolution really kick in?
Hi Jamie,
To keep this discussion from going in circles, it would be good to make sure
we have a common understanding of the "current momentum resolution/upsilon
resolution". At least from the plots shown at the January collaboration
meeting by Tony and Hugo the prospects for the Upsilon measurement look
reasonable (at least for 1S and 2S). Obviously one can't declare victory
until the TPC calibration chain for static and time-dependent distortions is
fully developed and validated. But I think we need to be careful about
understanding what the basis for strong statements like the one in your mail
are.
Best,
Gunther
-
[Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance,
Jamie Nagle, 02/08/2021
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance, Ming Liu, 02/08/2021
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance, Anthony Frawley, 02/08/2021
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance,
Hugo Pereira Da Costa, 02/09/2021
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance, Gunther M Roland, 02/09/2021
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance, Gunther M Roland, 02/09/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.