Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-tracking-l - Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] CA Seeding: current status

sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>
  • To: Michael Joseph Peters <mjpeters AT mit.edu>
  • Cc: "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] CA Seeding: current status
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:00:12 +0200

Hi Micheal, 

do you have plots showing just the seeding efficiency and nhits in the TPC?

Thanks 

    Christof 

On 9. Jun 2021, at 08:27, Michael Joseph Peters via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi all,


I was able to fix the issues with the two-iteration CA seeding, so here are the results intended for yesterday. All tests were run using the default G4_Tracking.C settings, with G4Hits files from 


/sphenix/user/frawley/new_macros_april27/macros/detectors/sPHENIX/hits_output/EmbedOut_0_20fm_50kHz_bkg_0_20fm-*.root


In addition to the second iteration, a number of minor refinements were applied to the CA seeding code, including, among other things, a reintroduction of cluster-chain-level seed merging and the application of a cluster cleaner before the Kalman filter (so that bad clusters don't contaminate the initial momentum estimate). These additions lead to something like a 5-10% improvement in efficiency, as shown below, while the second iteration on top of that unfortunately has very little benefit:


<effcompare.PNG>

A comparison of nhits is shown below; you can see the effect of the cluster cleaner moving 54-hit tracks down a few bins. The red and blue histograms are essentially on top of one another:


<nhitscompare.PNG>

There are also more tracks that fail at the ACTS level in the newer versions, likely an effect of pre-KF seed merging producing some weird-shaped tracks (which is the tradeoff for higher efficiency overall).


The quality of the pt and pz estimates does not significantly change between any of the versions.


So we now have a CA seeder that's roughly 80% efficient (instead of 70-75% efficient) above 0.5 GeV in pt in 50kHz pileup. I'll be scrapping the second iteration and getting together a pull request implementing the other changes.


The propagator still does more harm than good, unfortunately, which is why it wasn't included in any of these tests.


Thanks,


Michael Peters

_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-tracking-l mailing list
sPHENIX-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page