sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT
- From: "Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio" <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT lanl.gov>
- To: Ming Liu <ming AT bnl.gov>, "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 22:03:33 +0000
Hi Ming,
Track matching between TPOT and INTT/MVTX is indeed a serious issue if you don't have any help from the TPC to bridge the gap.
Also, I should stress again that the TPOT acceptance is very very small (~5% in azimuth). I am not sure what you can do with tracks going through MVTX+INTT+TPOT, beyond helping to calibrate the TPC.
So this study is really for bookkeeping only: the question was asked during the general meeting about what would be the momentum resolution with only MVTX/INTT and TPOT in the track fit, and here it is: significantly worse than with the TPC, as expected, but not zero either, just because of the level arm.
Hugo
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 3:45 PM
To: Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT
HI Hugo,
Very interesting results!
I guess in the AuAu collisions with high multiplicity, the track finding/connecting hits could be of great challenge as TPOT is far away from INTT? Or this is not an issue?
Cheers,
Ming
-----
|
Dr. Ming Xiong Liu P-3, MS H846 Physics Division
Office: 505.667.7125 Mobile: 505.412.7396 Los Alamos National Laboratory |
From:
sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of "Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio via sPHENIX-tracking-l" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Reply-To: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT lanl.gov>
Date: Friday, October 7, 2022 at 2:55 PM
To: "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT
Hi,
following some discussion at the last general meeting and the last software meeting I had a look at the momentum resolution you get when fitting tracks with MVTX, INTT and TPOT only, in TPOT acceptance (which is ~ 5% of the total acceptance in phi) and ignoring the TPC clusters for the time beeing.
The results are in the slides attached first with the current (over optimistic) TPOT spacial resolution, second with more realistic values.
This assumes that the detectors are perfectly aligned, and that track matching between INTT and MVTX to TPOT works (right now relying essentially on the TPC).
Note: for some reason my current simulations give a slightly worse momentum resolution that what we have in the have in e.g. the QA, when using MVTX, INTT and TPC, but that does not change the conclusions dramatically.
Comments welcome
Hugo
/_______________________________________________ sPHENIX-tracking-l mailing list sPHENIX-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l
-
[Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 10/07/2022
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Ming Liu, 10/07/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 10/07/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT, Anthony Frawley, 10/07/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 10/07/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.