sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion
List archive
[Sphenix-tracking-l] Question regarding cluster comparisons
- From: David Stewart <0ds.johnny AT gmail.com>
- To: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Question regarding cluster comparisons
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:48:53 -0500
Hi all,
In the truth to reco track matching code, the algorithm is (in part) as follows:
1. A truth track and a reco track of interest are found to be compared, based on proximity in phi/eta/pT.
2. An array, indexed by layer id, is filled with the cluster keys for both the truth and reco tracks.
3. In each layer, if there is a cluster key in both the reco and truth track, then the clusters are compared based on the {phi,z} and width of {phi,z} value for both the truth and reco track.
To step 3, I propose to preliminarily add the requirement that the hitsetkey also be identical between truth and reco tracks. Otherwise, the local geometry won't be the same between the two and the comparison of the phi values will be incorrect. True?
thanks--
David Stewart
Postdoctoral Fellow | Department of Physics, Wayne State University
-
[Sphenix-tracking-l] Question regarding cluster comparisons,
David Stewart, 11/28/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Question regarding cluster comparisons,
Osborn, Joseph, 11/28/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Question regarding cluster comparisons, David Stewart, 11/28/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Question regarding cluster comparisons,
Osborn, Joseph, 11/28/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.