sPHENIX tracking discussion

[Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>]

Hi Michael,

OK, good, that absolves the Acts track fit. The silicon seeding or the silicon-TPC  matching are the other candidates.

Thanks

Tony

---

From: Michael Joseph Peters <mjpeters AT mit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:39 AM
To: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: TPC Seeding Efficiency Comparison

 

Hi,

The full truth seeding does not have this behavior, at least:

I'm running the other possibilities now, will update once they finish.

Thanks,

Michael Peters

---

From: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:14 AM
To: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov; Michael Joseph Peters
Subject: Re: TPC Seeding Efficiency Comparison

 

Hello Michael,

Very interesting! The question is: where does the inefficiency come in? It could be:

  -- At the silicon seeding stage.

  -- At the silicon matching stage.

  -- At the Acts fitting stage.

If you use truth TPC seeding, the silicon-TPC matching is still done normally. It would be useful to try both of these:

  -- Add the truth silicon matching flag to truth TPC seeding (skips the silicon-TPC matcher).

  -- Using full truth seeding instead (skips the seeders and silicon-TPC matcher completely).

Cheers

Tony

---

From: sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Michael Joseph Peters via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 10:32 PM
To: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Sphenix-tracking-l] TPC Seeding Efficiency Comparison

 

Hi all,

Finally changed over to logarithmic binning, and ran all-new reco jobs for both a current-build CA seeding reference and a TPC-truth-seeding reference within the last few hours. Here is the resulting efficiency comparison:

There are two strange things I see here:

1) The drop at low pT occurs even with truth TPC seeding; and

2) CA seeding appears to somehow outperform truth TPC seeding at high pT.

Are either of these things understood? 

For details, the black points were produced with the default G4_Tracking.C and the red were produced using use_truth_tpc_seeding = true and use_truth_vertexing = true. (The truth vertexing was a holdover from an earlier test that I forgot to change; I don't think it would affect the efficiency much at all, but I'll run jobs tomorrow to verify.) Reco tracks were selected using nhits>40&&quality<10&&nmaps>0.

Thanks,

Michael Peters