Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-tracking-l - Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] 100-Pion Secondary Tracks

sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
  • To: Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Michael Joseph Peters <mjpeters AT mit.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] 100-Pion Secondary Tracks
  • Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:54:05 +0000

Hi Michael,

This is a reminder that when we look at tracking performance relative to truth, we need to use a truth sample that can be reconstructed.

Did you find any secondary tracks that left hits in the TPC?

Thanks
Tony

From: sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Michael Joseph Peters via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:42 PM
To: Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Sphenix-tracking-l] 100-Pion Secondary Tracks
 
Hi all,

As suggested in the tracking meeting this morning, here's a more detailed look at the properties of secondary tracks in an event consisting of only 100 pions.

This was created using the simple event generator, 100 pi-, each with a pt of 5 GeV, using the default Fun4All macro settings for everything else.

First, the gpt distribution of secondary tracks (those labeled with gprimary==0):


As you can see, there's a significant number of secondary tracks with quite high gpt. (For the record, this plot looks identical with gtrackID<0 instead of gprimary==0.) Here's the gvz distribution for these tracks as a function of gpt (cutting off the low-gpt tracks for clarity of reading):


So the vertex of the higher-gpt content is distributed fairly uniformly throughout (and outside?) the detector. As for gvx and gvy:


Assuming that the units here are cm, as usual, this explains the last plot: these tracks are apparently starting in the calorimeters. And, sure enough, if you plot (gnlmaps+gnlintt+gnltpc) for them, you get:


Basically all zero, which confirms that these "tracks" are actually just parts of a calorimeter shower.

So, for the purposes of the dEdx plots, all you need to do is cut on whether the truth tracks have any truth hits in the tracker at all.

But more broadly: why are these defined as "truth tracks" in the SvtxEvaluator in the first place? Should they be there?

Thanks,

Michael Peters

(Plots are attached for clients that do not display inline images.)



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page