Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-tracking-l - [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides

sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira.da.costa AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Osborn, Joe" <osbornjd AT ornl.gov>, Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>, Tony Frawley <frawley AT fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu>, "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT lanl.gov>
  • Subject: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides
  • Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 11:37:43 -0600

Joe, Christof, others,

1/ the CDB tag I use in the reconstruction macro is the one I got from Tony:


  // condition database
  Enable::CDB = true;
  rc->set_StringFlag("CDB_GLOBALTAG", "ProdA_2024");
  rc->set_uint64Flag("TIMESTAMP", 6);

  // tracking geometry
  std::string geofile = CDBInterface::instance()->getUrl("Tracking_Geometry");
  auto ingeo = new Fun4AllRunNodeInputManager("GeoIn");
  ingeo->AddFile(geofile);
  se->registerInputManager(ingeo);

Is this the correct one ?

2/ to Christof: I have updated the slides I posted at https://indico.bnl.gov/event/24192/contributions/95299/attachments/56417/96569/TpcResiduals_hp.pdf to look in more detail at delta_phi vs layer with charge cut. This is in slide 9.

There is a charge dependnece when getting near TPOT, and since each charge tends to favor one sector rather than the other, this would point to a sector dependent phi misalignment in TPOT, as you hinted during the meeting.

3/ Any help about how to add per-layer delta phi (and delta_z) alignment offsets via text file would be very appreciated ! (Tony ? Joe ?)

Best,


Hugo






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page