sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion
List archive
Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides
- From: Anthony Frawley <frawley AT fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu>
- To: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira.da.costa AT gmail.com>, "Osborn, Joe" <osbornjd AT ornl.gov>, Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>, "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio" <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT lanl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 18:06:44 +0000
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2024 1:13 PM
To: Anthony Frawley <frawley AT fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu>; Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira.da.costa AT gmail.com>; Osborn, Joe <osbornjd AT ornl.gov>; Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: RE: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides
Hi Tony,
I have started to play around with local alignment parameters and in particular rotations.
Just making sure I got the convention right:
In the email below:
Alpha, beta and gamma are the angle from the surface normal vector to the global x, y and z axis, is that correct ? So if I want to make a polar (in x,y plane) rotation of the surface of value phi I should use
alpha = +phi
beta = phi – pi/2
gamma = 0 ?
Or do I get the signs mixed up ?
Thank you,
Hugo
From: Anthony Frawley <frawley AT fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2024 1:32 PM
To: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira.da.costa AT gmail.com>; Osborn, Joe <osbornjd AT ornl.gov>; Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>; sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Cc: Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT lanl.gov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Follow up on today's slides
Hi Hugo,
The easiest way to do 3) is to edit a copy of the current alignment parameters file to change the TPOT values.
If you can download the CDB version that would be best.
Otherwise:
I am on an airplane right now, with close to useless internet speed, so I am working from memory, and the details here are approximate.
Look in my directory
/sphenix/user/frawley/production/macros/TrackingProduction/
There are some files "xxx_localAlignmentParamsFile.txt. The latest one is what is in the CDB. Copy that over to your working directory, rename it "localAlignmentParamsFile.txt" and edit the lines starting with TPOT hitsetkeys. The format is:
hitsetkey dalpha dbeta dgamma dx dy dz
in radians and mm.
Cheers
Tony
From: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira.da.costa AT gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2024 1:37 PM
To: Osborn, Joe <osbornjd AT ornl.gov>; Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>; Anthony Frawley <frawley AT fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu>;
sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT lanl.gov>
Subject: Follow up on today's slides
Joe, Christof, others,
1/ the CDB tag I use in the reconstruction macro is the one I got from Tony:
// condition database
Enable::CDB = true;
rc->set_StringFlag("CDB_GLOBALTAG", "ProdA_2024");
rc->set_uint64Flag("TIMESTAMP", 6);
// tracking geometry
std::string geofile =
CDBInterface::instance()->getUrl("Tracking_Geometry");
auto ingeo = new Fun4AllRunNodeInputManager("GeoIn");
ingeo->AddFile(geofile);
se->registerInputManager(ingeo);
Is this the correct one ?
2/ to Christof: I have updated the slides I posted at
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Findico.bnl.gov%2Fevent%2F24192%2Fcontributions%2F95299%2Fattachments%2F56417%2F96569%2FTpcResiduals_hp.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cfrawley%40fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu%7C4754271da8d24546ac3408dcb7d0d062%7Ca36450ebdb0642a78d1b026719f701e3%7C0%7C0%7C638587355126212973%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WuPrR92EVWLfAWCAsBND1Wb6aLQ5o8Usew1IUDhLe0M%3D&reserved=0
to look in more detail at delta_phi vs layer with charge cut. This is in
slide 9.
There is a charge dependnece when getting near TPOT, and since each
charge tends to favor one sector rather than the other, this would point
to a sector dependent phi misalignment in TPOT, as you hinted during the
meeting.
3/ Any help about how to add per-layer delta phi (and delta_z) alignment
offsets via text file would be very appreciated ! (Tony ? Joe ?)
Best,
Hugo
-
[[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides,
Hugo Pereira Da Costa, 08/08/2024
-
Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides,
Anthony Frawley, 08/08/2024
-
RE: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 08/16/2024
- Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides, Anthony Frawley, 08/16/2024
-
RE: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 08/16/2024
-
Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Follow up on today's slides,
Anthony Frawley, 08/08/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.