sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion
List archive
- From: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
- To: "Osborn, Joseph" <josborn1 AT bnl.gov>, Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 21:05:29 +0000
Good. I also noticed that the seed matching windows are unchanged:
// these get us to about 83% INTT > 1
silicon_Seeding->setinttRPhiSearchWindow(0.4);
silicon_Seeding->setinttZSearchWindow(2.0);
would best be:
silicon_Seeding->setinttRPhiSearchWindow(0.2);
silicon_Seeding->setinttZSearchWindow(1.0);
Tony
From: Osborn, Joseph <josborn1 AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 4:00 PM
To: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>; Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Updated Macro
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 4:00 PM
To: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>; Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Updated Macro
Hi Tony,
I agree, I noticed when running some tests this afternoon that the number of reconstructed vertices goes down pretty significantly with this high of a cut. We should explore the cut space and try to determine what the best options are, in the meantime I can reduce this to 0.1 for now.
Joe
___________________________
Joe Osborn, Ph.D
Physics Department
Brookhaven National Laboratory
josborn1 AT bnl.gov
From: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 3:52 PM
To: Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Osborn, Joseph <josborn1 AT bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Updated Macro
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 3:52 PM
To: Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Osborn, Joseph <josborn1 AT bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Updated Macro
Hi Joe and All,
I think that a pT cut of 0.5 GeV/c is too high for primary vertexing in pp collisions. It will dramatically reduce the vertex finding efficiency for minbias events. I think we should use a cut that is no higher than 0.2, and really 0.1 is probably better.
The other cuts are probably fine for now.
Cheers
Tony
From: sphenix-tracking-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-tracking-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Osborn, Joseph <josborn1 AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 12:18 PM
To: Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 12:18 PM
To: Anthony Frawley via sPHENIX-tracking-l <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro
Hi all,
I updated the macro to make the changes discussed today. See the PR here to see how you can update your macro similarly, or do a git pull.
Joe
___________________________
Joe Osborn, Ph.D
Physics Department
Brookhaven National Laboratory
josborn1 AT bnl.gov
-
[[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro,
Osborn, Joseph, 03/06/2025
-
Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro,
Anthony Frawley, 03/06/2025
-
Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro,
Osborn, Joseph, 03/06/2025
- Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro, Anthony Frawley, 03/06/2025
-
Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro,
Osborn, Joseph, 03/06/2025
-
Re: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] Updated Macro,
Anthony Frawley, 03/06/2025
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.