Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Dylan Neff for DNP 2020 submitted for review

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl>
  • To: Star-cf <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Dylan Neff for DNP 2020 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:57:34 +0200

Dear Dylan,

I have only minor comments regarding your nice presentation.

General comment: I would suggest putting less text on your slides. 
Try to think what you can suppress little bit.

I would extend this part where you introduce motivation. Something about model you use, more about general motivation.

As you don’t show any STAR data yet, I have only a couple of questions:
Have you tried other binning?

What about the uncertainties you have? Can you add some information about them?

With those implemented, I sign off too.

Thanks,
Hanna



Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk
PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:
Warsaw University of Technology
Faculty of Physics
Nuclear Physics Division
Koszykowa 75
Office: 117b (via 115)
00-662 Warsaw, Poland


Wiadomość napisana przez Xiaofeng Luo via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 19.10.2020, o godz. 11:54:

Dear Dylan,

    Nice presentation.

    Since your slides only show results from AMPT and no STAR data yet, please find my minor suggestions/comment:

    1. It would be nice if you can prepare a slide to show the physics motivation of this analysis.
        For example, search for baryon clustering induced by CP ?

    2. It would be nice if you can have a slide to describe the AMPT model (default or string melting ?) and event statistics you used for each
        energy.

    3. In slide 8 and other slides, I see caps on the error bars, what is that ? systematic uncertainties ? But those are from model calculations and should have no systematic errors. I would be nice you have formula definition of kurtosis here. And how did you calculate the statistic errors, reference  ?

    4. I suggest to put "AMPT model" in figures, otherwise people may think it is STAR BES data.

    5. Did you try more bins rather than 3 bins ? It would be good you can compare results from different bin size.

    With those implemented, I sign off.
    Looking forward your nice results from STAR BES data in future PWG meeting.


Thank you,
Best Regards,
Xiaofeng

On 2020/10/15 2:32 PM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:
Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Dylan Neff (dneff AT physics.ucla.edu) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52378

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page