STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Xiaofeng Luo <xfluo.star AT hotmail.com>]

Hi Sam，

    Thank you for the updates, I sign off.

Thank you,
Best Regards,
Xiaofeng

On 2020/10/26 5:26 AM, Sam Heppelmann via Star-cf-l wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please find my update DNP slides here:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/dnp-2020/proton-higher-order-cumulants-auau-sqrtsnn30-gev
>
> Best,
> Sam
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:40 AM Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk via Star-cf-l <
> star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Dear Sam,
> >
> > After Xiaofeng’s comments, with those implemented I sign off.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hanna
> >
> >
> > *Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk*
> > PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT
> >
> > *E-mail*: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl
> > *Tel*: +48 22 234 5851 (office)
> >
> > *Address*:
> > Warsaw University of Technology
> > Faculty of Physics
> > Nuclear Physics Division
> > Koszykowa 75
> > Office: 117b (via 115)
> > 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
> >
> > Wiadomość napisana przez Xiaofeng Luo via Star-cf-l <
> > star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 18.10.2020, o godz. 12:52:
> >
> > Dear Sam,
> >
> >      Nice presentation.
> >      Please find my comments and suggestions below :
> >
> >      1. Title : Proton Higher Order Cumulants AuAu 𝑠𝑁𝑁=3.0GeV ->
> >          Higher Order Cumulants of Proton Multiplicity Distributions in
> > Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 3.0 GeV.
> >
> >      2. Add "for the STAR Collaboration"
> >
> >      3. Slide 3, I suggest to re-write slide 3.
> >          Current slide 3 didn't serve the purpose of motivation of this
> > measurement : sensitive to correlation length and search for the
> >          critical point. You may want to show how the cumulants related
> > with the correlation length with some references.
> >
> >      4. In slide 4, Title -> STAR net-proton fluctuations Measurement from
> > BES-I
> >          show a rise at ... -> show a rise trend below 19.6 GeV.
> >
> >      5. In slide 5, please add more information, for example, the event
> > statistics, muB value, the year of taking this data etc..
> >          The coordinate system used in this analysis is not STAR
> > conventional one. Please mention this how the positive rapidity is define.
> >          Should mention the beam direction is defined as positive rapidity
> > direction.
> >
> >      6. Slide 6, Please write down the black box is -0.5<y<0.5, 0.4<pT<2
> > GeV/c  in the slide. and TPC and TOF PID are used.
> >
> >      7. Slide 7, the unity of pt and mass square (x-axis of PID plot) in
> > the slide are not correct. it should be GeV/c and (GeV/c^2)^2
> >                      Please write down the PID cuts used for each pt range.
> >
> >      8. I suggest to put the backup slide 18 just after the slide 8.
> > Because those two corrections (CBWC and efficiency correction) are very
> >          important for this analysis. And please also mention how to
> > evaluate the statistical errors in this slide.
> >
> >      9. Slide 10, You and Yu may cross refer each other, since Yu also has
> > a presentation (model studies) in DNP meeting.
> >
> >      10. Slide 12 and 13,  as we discussed in high moments focus meeting,
> > the CBWC used at 3 GeV is not efficient/enough to suppress volume
> >            fluctuations at mid-central and peripheral collisions. You can
> > also find a model study :
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03755__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!RcO-xMpV0lTRm5AFg3119ViOXHP0HUD_qf2eVDbVvabAEF5JzD8UdkbiAspQfgyXOhAh21k$
> >            Currently,  as we haven't find good solution to suppress volume
> > fluctuation yet before DNP meeting, I suggest we only show most
> >            central data points for higher order cumulants (C2, C3, C4 and
> > cumulant ratios), where we have least volume fluctuation effect.
> >            You can discuss the results from central results by doing
> > several comparisons : before and after different corrections.
> >
> >      11. Slide 14, I suggest write down one or two bullets to discuss
> > what's the most important finding from this study.
> >            And also this plot, only FXT data points are STAR preliminary
> > and other results from BES-I are final, we may reflect
> >            this in the legend (or put arXIv number for BES-I results in
> > legend).
> >
> >      12. Summary, I suggest mention the 0-5% results are consistent with
> > the results with UrQMD within uncertainties, which is dominated by
> >            the effects of baryon number conservation. We may add one table
> > or several bullets mention the data taken in BES-II and FXT energies.
> >
> > Recently, I gave a seminar on the CP experimental search, you may find the
> > video and slide at :
> >
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://indico.ihep.ac.cn/event/11115/material/slides/5.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!RcO-xMpV0lTRm5AFg3119ViOXHP0HUD_qf2eVDbVvabAEF5JzD8UdkbiAspQfgyXolvcT3E$
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://indico.ihep.ac.cn/event/11115/material/1/8.mp4__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!RcO-xMpV0lTRm5AFg3119ViOXHP0HUD_qf2eVDbVvabAEF5JzD8UdkbiAspQfgyXQ-0F9k8$
> > I hope It would help you to prepare the slide and talk.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Best Regards,
> > Xiaofeng
> >
> >
> > On 2020/10/16 12:26 AM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:
> >
> > Dearstar-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov  members,
> >
> > Samuel Heppelmann (sheppelmann AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a
> > review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52385
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
>
>
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.