STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Xiaofeng Luo <xfluo.star AT hotmail.com>]

Hi Yu,

    Nice proceedings.
    I have few minor suggestions :

    1. Line 54 :  shows no non-monotonic energy dependence -> shows 
monotonic energy dependence

    2. Line 55:   is not qualitatively described by HRG and UrQMD -> 
can not be described by different variants (GCE, EV, CE) of HRG and 
UrQMD model

    3. Line 59 : negative sign -> negative signs

    4. Line 62-63: Similar to C6/C2, It is better to quantify the 
deviation for C5/C1 not just mention which is positive or negative . For 
eg. what is the significance of deviation from zero. less than 2 sigma   
?   or consistent with zero ?

    5.  Line 76: s due to crossover phase transition -> due to smooth 
crossover transition

    6. Summary: We may also mention : In 2023-2025, STAR plan to 
collect 15-20 billion Au+Au 200 GeV high statistics data . This allows 
us to perform
        precise measurement of higher-order cumulants, maybe even to 
8th order.

    7： Line 25: net-baryon number -> net-baryon  ($B$); net-charge 
number -> net-charge (Q) ; net-strangeness number -> net-strangeness ($S$)

    8 : Line 20:  suggests that the phase transition is a smooth 
crossover -> suggests a smooth crossover transition.

    With those implemented, I sign off.

Thank you,
Best Regards,
Xiaofeng


On 2021/7/23 12:02, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:
> Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Yu Zhang (zhang_yu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
> please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/55686
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l