STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>]

Hi Jonathan and All,

Nice slides.
In slide 5, the figure x-axis label somehow cut off, it reads ‘2x10’ instead 
of “200”;
In the same figure, why the pT region is 0.9<pT<2 GeV/c instead of 0.5<pT<2 
GeV/c shown in other figures?

Regards,
Nu


> On Mar 31, 2022, at 7:06 AM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-cf-l 
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Dear Jonathan, I forgot to mention the following reason for the comparison 
> between 
> your net-lambda and submitted net-proton fluctuation at the same energy 
> with the 
> same dataset. From the comparison, the basic trend is quite similar 
> (although the quite 
> different magnitude) with respect to the net-proton results, so that you 
> might be able to 
> say the dominant mechanism would be similar including the 
> baryon-conservation etc 
> and could also would give an additional confidence of both results... 
> Best regards, ShinIchi
> 
>> On Mar 31, 2022, at 22:51, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-cf-l 
>> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Jonathan
>> Thank you for the nice study and result for your poster. 
>> I find your poster very good and send you a few comments for a possible 
>> improvement. 
>> In future, you could also try to apply a new purity correction that is 
>> proposed by Toshihiro, 
>> as you might know from : 
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06953__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!XaJ1ls8aOAr8YqLHxwZgpcPQ-BMKeoFtJ4m8Rm0YaaqiCAAaI0Xfl_gf3g13v0BPSoykShs$
>>   
>> Best regards, ShinIchi
>> 
>> P4: I would include a small inset panel in each of all 7 panels in this 
>> page, in order to 
>> compare the trend with the net-proton data from submitted 3GeV FXT paper 
>> that will 
>> also be shown in Yu Zhang’s talk, where the magnitude is quite different, 
>> so that we 
>> can not overlay the points in your plot, therefore I’m suggesting to add a 
>> small inset panel 
>> in each of 7 plots showing c1~c4 and 3 ratios vs Npart, that can be taken 
>> from Yu’s slide 
>> p12 in his talk. Within this inset panel, you could overlay your points, 
>> if you like to. 
>> 
>> P5: Please increase the symbol size especially for the experimental data 
>> points as well as 
>> for the ones from UrQMD at 3GeV. The yellowish (or gold color) is not 
>> really visible, maybe 
>> just because of the size and line width, but I would guess you can not 
>> change with line width, 
>> if it indicates the systematic/statistical errors in the model. (Please 
>> also indicate the meaning 
>> of the line width in the plot.) At least, all the point size can be 
>> enlarged, but I would also 
>> choose some other color like red or dark-red/dark-green etc for UrQMD. 
>> 
>>> On Mar 30, 2022, at 15:45, Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo 
>>> <jballcap AT Central.UH.EDU> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear ShinIchi,
>>> 
>>> You can find my updated poster in the following link:
>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/58753
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jonathan Ball 
>>> From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 9:05 AM
>>> To: Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo <jballcap AT Central.UH.EDU>
>>> Cc: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
>>> Subject: QM22 poster
>>>  
>>> Dear Jonathan
>>> I has been assigned to review your poster for QM22 by 
>>> the STAR management, but I might have missed your E-mail 
>>> to CF or to STAR mailing list, so please remind me the web 
>>> location of your poster for QM22? Thank you and I’m looking 
>>> tor seeing your nice results. 
>>> Best regards, ShinIchi
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-cf-l mailing list
>> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l