Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] QM22 poster from Jonathan Ball

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo" <jballcap AT Central.UH.EDU>
  • To: Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>, ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>, STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] QM22 poster from Jonathan Ball
  • Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 03:04:21 +0000

Dear Nu Xu and All,

 

Thank you for your comments, I have corrected the x-axis label and update the invariant mass distribution figure with the proper acceptance.  Find the uploaded version here:

 

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2022/Fluctuations-Lambda-Multiplicity-Distribution-AuAu-collisions-sqrt-0

 

Best regards,

Jonathan Ball

 

 

From: Nu Xu
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 9:49 AM
To: ShinIchi Esumi; STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG
Cc: Nu Xu; Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo
Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] QM22 poster from Jonathan Ball

 

Hi Jonathan and All,

Nice slides.
In slide 5, the figure x-axis label somehow cut off, it reads ‘2x10’ instead of “200”;
In the same figure, why the pT region is 0.9<pT<2 GeV/c instead of 0.5<pT<2 GeV/c shown in other figures?

Regards,
Nu


> On Mar 31, 2022, at 7:06 AM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear Jonathan, I forgot to mention the following reason for the comparison between
> your net-lambda and submitted net-proton fluctuation at the same energy with the
> same dataset. From the comparison, the basic trend is quite similar (although the quite
> different magnitude) with respect to the net-proton results, so that you might be able to
> say the dominant mechanism would be similar including the baryon-conservation etc
> and could also would give an additional confidence of both results...
> Best regards, ShinIchi
>
>> On Mar 31, 2022, at 22:51, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Jonathan
>> Thank you for the nice study and result for your poster.
>> I find your poster very good and send you a few comments for a possible improvement.
>> In future, you could also try to apply a new purity correction that is proposed by Toshihiro,
>> as you might know from : https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06953__;!!LkSTlj0I!GV-fj10S7ycGIjwNJyVNTGSEQzoCaXzSLMMI2JXtoQSJOFL4NYe3UZ6-ZZWCZN2JCD5pktvkpRRpTIaH-A$ 
>> Best regards, ShinIchi
>>
>> P4: I would include a small inset panel in each of all 7 panels in this page, in order to
>> compare the trend with the net-proton data from submitted 3GeV FXT paper that will
>> also be shown in Yu Zhang’s talk, where the magnitude is quite different, so that we
>> can not overlay the points in your plot, therefore I’m suggesting to add a small inset panel
>> in each of 7 plots showing c1~c4 and 3 ratios vs Npart, that can be taken from Yu’s slide
>> p12 in his talk. Within this inset panel, you could overlay your points, if you like to.
>>
>> P5: Please increase the symbol size especially for the experimental data points as well as
>> for the ones from UrQMD at 3GeV. The yellowish (or gold color) is not really visible, maybe
>> just because of the size and line width, but I would guess you can not change with line width,
>> if it indicates the systematic/statistical errors in the model. (Please also indicate the meaning
>> of the line width in the plot.) At least, all the point size can be enlarged, but I would also
>> choose some other color like red or dark-red/dark-green etc for UrQMD.
>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2022, at 15:45, Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo <jballcap AT Central.UH.EDU> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear ShinIchi,
>>>
>>> You can find my updated poster in the following link:
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/58753__;!!LkSTlj0I!GV-fj10S7ycGIjwNJyVNTGSEQzoCaXzSLMMI2JXtoQSJOFL4NYe3UZ6-ZZWCZN2JCD5pktvkpRQ9RNihfg$
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jonathan Ball
>>> From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 9:05 AM
>>> To: Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo <jballcap AT Central.UH.EDU>
>>> Cc: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
>>> Subject: QM22 poster
>>> 
>>> Dear Jonathan
>>> I has been assigned to review your poster for QM22 by
>>> the STAR management, but I might have missed your E-mail
>>> to CF or to STAR mailing list, so please remind me the web
>>> location of your poster for QM22? Thank you and I’m looking
>>> tor seeing your nice results.
>>> Best regards, ShinIchi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-cf-l mailing list
>> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l__;!!LkSTlj0I!GV-fj10S7ycGIjwNJyVNTGSEQzoCaXzSLMMI2JXtoQSJOFL4NYe3UZ6-ZZWCZN2JCD5pktvkpRQZFdGPZQ$
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l__;!!LkSTlj0I!GV-fj10S7ycGIjwNJyVNTGSEQzoCaXzSLMMI2JXtoQSJOFL4NYe3UZ6-ZZWCZN2JCD5pktvkpRQZFdGPZQ$

 



  • Re: [Star-cf-l] QM22 poster from Jonathan Ball, Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo, 04/01/2022

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page