Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Debasish Mallick for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Debasish Mallick <dmallick AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>, STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Debasish Mallick for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 10:09:28 +0530

Dear Nu,
Thank you very much for your nice suggestions.

Please find my answers inline to your suggestions.
The updated slides is in the same link and also attached here in the email.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DtrnFluct_QM22_v8.pdf

Thanks again,
With Best Regards,
Debasish



On 2022-04-01 21:05, Nu Xu via Star-cf-l wrote:
Hi Debasish,

Here are my suggestions for the nice talk:

1) On slide 15 - last bullet: Is it right that in the coalescence
approach, neither correlated nor independent, between p and n,
reproduce the data. Although the independent approach predicted the
right trend?
As one can see in the figure, the independent approach underestimated
the strength of the p-d correlation .
At the moment, the bullet may lead to conclusion that the independent
option reproduced the data.

-- Done. Modified the point to mention exactly that neither of the two assumptions in the toy model reproduce the data. I will keep in mind to mention in the talk about the independent approach predicting the trend correctly while underestimating the strength of the correlation.


2) slide 16 - left figure: Should we add the STAR 3GeV data point in?
-- Added.


3) slide 17 - outlook - (i) 1st bullet: remove ‘more faithfully’; (ii)
I do not understand the last bullet. It is incomplete to me.

-- Removed 'more faithfully'.
In the outlook, just wanted the last point could somewhat reflect one of the main features of BES-II i.e. the improved acceptance. But, I understand that the last point seems incomplete. I have removed the last point.
I added one point following from the discussion of slide-16 as follows.
"Understand the production mechanism and freeze-out properties of light nuclei".
Kindly let me know your thoughts.


Regards,
Nu

On Apr 1, 2022, at 3:47 AM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Debasish Mallick (debasish.mallick AT niser.ac.in) has submitted a material for
a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59055

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page