Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Grigory Nigmatkulov for Nucleus-2022 submitted for review

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Grigory Nigmatkulov <nigmatkulov AT gmail.com>
  • To: Xiaofeng Luo <xfluo.star AT hotmail.com>, STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Grigory Nigmatkulov for Nucleus-2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:19:26 +0300

Dear Takafumi, Hanna and Xiaofeng,

Thank you very much for your nice comments. Please find the updated version attached:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Nigmatkulov_Nucleus2022_v4.pdf

Please find responses below.

>s3: Resolution of the bottom table is not so good. If possible, please replace it with better one.
I tried my best.

>s8: In 1st bullet, “at kinetic freeze-out” This would be true only when using hadrons (which is the most of cases though…)
I agree and removed "at kinetic freeze-out".

>s9: In title, I would remove “in Au+Au Collisions” or replace it with “Heavy-Ion Collisions” since you show results from ALICE and other experiments and mention "2.76 TeV”
Done

>s10: 
>- Left-bottom, larger than that those for -> larger than those for
>- Right-top, since you give a talk on behalf of STAR, please remove STAR collaborator name (and conference name)
Done

>s11: Same comment on removing STAR collaborator name
Done

>s12: Same comment on removing STAR collaborator name except “Anna Kraeva’s talk”
Done

>s13: you may want to mention how the collectivity is studied/visible via Femtoscopy, e.g. kT dependence of radius
Text added.

>Still incorrect. Should be: q_{inv} = \sqrt{(p_1 - p_2)^2 - (E_1 - E_2)^2} 
>Check here for a reference: Phys.Rev.C83:064905,2011
The used equation is correct and is identical to the one from the paper.

Best regards,
Grigory





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page