Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Ashish Pandav for SQM 2022 submitted for review

Please Wait...

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: apandav <apandav AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: Xiaofeng Luo <xfluo.star AT hotmail.com>, STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Ashish Pandav for SQM 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 13:34:02 +0530

Dear Xiaofeng and Hanna,

Thanks for signing off with these suggestions.

They are incorporated in the revised draft (same link).
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60597

I would like to request you to approve it for star-talks unless there are any further suggestions.

Best regards,
Ashish



On 2022-08-27 22:32, Xiaofeng Luo via Star-cf-l wrote:
Hi Ashish,

    Nice proceedings.
    Please find my suggestions below :

    1. Title : number -> multiplicity
    2. 2nd line in the introduction: atleast -> at least
    3. quark-gluon-plasma -> quark-gluon plasma
    4. " The negative values, albeit with large uncertainties, and
energy dependence is consistent with lattice QCD prediction for a
crossover [6]."
It seems the conclusion is too strong indicating 7.7-200 GeV are all
crossover. The reference 6 only has calculation with muB less than 200
MeV.(<20 GeV)
Please specify the energy range and use the conclusions in the STAR
paper 2207.09837.

    5. The journal # of reference 14 should be Phys. Rev. D 104,
094047 (2021). Please update it.
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094047__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!ErePFd-OSsUqN-l7Q7P66gPduiKe8g8bDJAGQbDJRM6w7jY9i2-hiQIgdyjYE_CpD6fa1g6WF2YtVLsTEqsj1_-XoXft$


    6. Starting from "Interestingly, the combined signs of χ B 6 and χ
B 8 can probe different phases...."
        I would suggest not argue like this simply and may even not show Fig.2.
        Because : 1) C6 and C8 are complicated as a function of T and
muB. The Fig. 1 only shows results at muB=0.
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/43/5/054109__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!ErePFd-OSsUqN-l7Q7P66gPduiKe8g8bDJAGQbDJRM6w7jY9i2-hiQIgdyjYE_CpD6fa1g6WF2YtVLsTEqsj1w3bm12V$
                      2) In heavy-ion collisions, non-equilibrium
effect and other background effects, such as baryon number
conservation should be carefully studied
                          they may have different impact on C6 and C8.

       You may say something like : they show negative values around
Tc, which can be used to probe the quark-hadron phase transition
boundary
      and smooth crossover at muB=0, predicted by Lattice QCD.

    7. Please specify the year taken for the 27 GeV.

    8. In summary : ∼ 20 billion Au+Au collision events ->  ∼ 20
billion Au+Au collision minimum bias events
         scheduled to be -> are scheduled to be


    With those implemented, I sign off.


Thank you,
Best Regards,
Xiaofeng

On 2022/8/24 01:03, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:
Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Ashish Pandav (apandav10 AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60597

Deadline: 2022-08-28
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l



  • Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Ashish Pandav for SQM 2022 submitted for review, apandav, 09/06/2022

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page