STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Zachary Sweger <zwsweger AT ucdavis.edu>]

Dear Hanna and Toshihiro,

Thank you for the comments. I believe I've implemented all of them and the new version is uploaded (https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Sweger_MoriondProceedings_v1.pdf)

Two notes:

• LMR, IMR, and HMR are spelled out on lines 55 and 56.
• The conference had requested that each proceedings come with a photo of the author and provided us a template. But they said this was not required, and the new edits brought the page count to over 4, so I had to delete the photo anyway.

Thank you!

Zach

On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 5:54 AM webmaster--- via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Hanna Zbroszczyk ( hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl ) has commented on a material 
originally submitted by Zachary Sweger ( zwsweger AT ucdavis.edu ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Rencontres-de-Moriond/Recent-Results-and-Future-Prospects-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-Prog-0

Comment:
Dear Zachary,
please find my comments below on your nice proceedings. I am not sure whether 
you should put your photo.  I don't insist on removing it, but please 
reconsider if you really want to have it.
Introduction, 1st page, 4th line from the bottom: mentioning collision 
energies, do not forget to add \sqrt{s_{NN}}.
Figure 1: please increase.
Section 2, add a reference to HBT parametrization: BP (out-side-long).
A peak in R_out/R_side .. is predicted. -> can be predicted.
Section 3: define LMR, IMR (extend abbreviations)
Section 4: second paragraph from 7.7 .. -> from \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 7.7. ..
and later: in 3.0 GeV -> in \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 3.0 GeV.

With those and Toshihiro's comments, I sign off.
Thanks,
Hanna


---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l