STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl>]

Dear Yu,

Please find my comments on your nice talk. Some of them came after yesterday's meeting.

Slide 2:

I suggest adding at least a short discussion (and some figure or figures) describing the NS puzzle, explaining briefly why N-N and N-Y interactions are relevant to provide a hint towards EoS for NS. I also propose that the lowest STAR energies lie on the QCD phase diagram closer to the area describing NS that LHC and top RHIC.

Slide 3:

As I mentioned yesterday, using PRF, k*defines the first momentum in the pair. Please make sure that all symbols you use are consistent with their definitions.

There is no need to spend any time to introduce all these variables during your talk. However, I suggest defining all symbols and variables you mention in this slide.

Points of your emission seem to be outside of the source. I suggest moving them and to describe as x_1 and x_2

I need your comment about what do you mean by "three-body"? Do you treat d-\La as (p+n)-\La? Do you mean to consider interactions between p and n? I think you treat d as a point object. We need to understand what do you mean to be at the same page.

Slide 5:

3 GeV -> \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 3 GeV (twice)

Gev -> GeV (bottom-left figure)

When you mention the high statistics you use, you can mention what exactly to you mean in M.

Slide 7:

About corrections, why not mention those when you briefly discuss systematics (later)?

Make sure you define all symbols used here.

The same comment about emission points as on slide 3.

Slide 8:

I suggest to change corrections -> systematic uncertainties. Please separate statistical and systematic uncertainties, if possible..

Slide 9:

Again, my recommendation is Corrections -> Systematics.

Extracted parameters are still missing..

Slide 10:

Please check the numbers below k* = 100 MeV/c.. It looks as normalization issues.

Following slides with results: writing for your fitting updates. Please replace these figures as soon as possible.

Summary and outlook:

Please consider writing shorter bullets with main physics conclusions instead of whole sentences.

Waiting for your updates,

Thanks,

Hanna

Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk

PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl

Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:

Warsaw University of Technology

Faculty of Physics

Nuclear Physics Division

Koszykowa 75

Office: 117b (via 115)

00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Wiadomość napisana przez webmaster--- via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 22.08.2023, o godz. 11:01:

Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Yu Hu (yuhu AT bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a review, please have a  
look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64804

Deadline: 2023-09-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l