Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Rutik Manikandhan for WWND 2024 submitted for review

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rutik Manikandhan <manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com>
  • To: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Rutik Manikandhan for WWND 2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 14:38:25 -0600

Hello Nu,
Thank you for the suggestions,
1) I understand, but we did conduct some more thorough checks on UrQMD and I'll show them at our next meeting.
2) I have added a line regarding the asymmetric acceptance at 3 GeV.
3) It has been removed.
4) During the last few meetings, there were concerns raised about the effects of spectator/primordial protons on the correlator.
   Studying the correlator as a function of pseudorapidity was suggested and that has been calculated, I shall show these results at the next meeting as well.

I am attaching the link to the updated version here : https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/WWND_2024%20%281%29.pdf

Thank you!

Best,
Rutik Manikandhan
PhD Candidate, Experimental High Energy Group
Physics Dept.
University of Houston


On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 10:34 AM Nu Xu via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Rutik and All,

 I have the following suggestion on your abstract to WWND2024:
1) I am concerned about the dramatic difference between the 3.0GeV data and previously published results from the collider energies.
And the difference between the data and results from UrQMD.

2) Experimentally the main difference is the acceptance in eluding the rapidity and pt coverage. I suggest make it clear about the charge particle acceptance from the 3 GeV data.

3) For now I suggest remove the sentence in line 16 and 17. We do not need to declare the result in the abstract.

4) Last sentence: I am not sure what do you mean “the effect of primordial protons on the results”. May be I missed some of the discussions.

Best regards,

Nu


> On Dec 30, 2023, at 10:29 AM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Rutik Manikandhan (manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for 
> a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66323
>
> Deadline: 2024-01-05
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page