star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Vinh Luong for 58th meeting of the PAC for ... submitted for review
- From: Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>
- To: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>, Vinh Luong <lbavinh AT gmail.com>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Vinh Luong for 58th meeting of the PAC for ... submitted for review
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:46:31 -0800
Hi Vinh and All,
Here are my suggestions/questions for your poster:
1) Abstract - first sentence: replace ‘for the models of heavy ion
collisions.’ by “for model calculations.”;
2) Introduction: the parameter ‘lambda’ should be defined;
3) Results on k_T, collision energy and y_pair-dependences: (i) move the
Collision Energy dependence to the left, then y-dependence (middle) and k_t
dependence (right);
(ii) It will be easier for readers if we use the same symbols for pion- and
pion+ pairs for all of the three figures;
(iii) For the rapidity dependence figure, I can understand y_cm stands for
the pion rapidity in center-of-mass frame. I am not sure about ‘y_cm -
y_pair’. I would suggest we use “Pion Rapidity y_cm” for this figure;
(iv) I would also suggest rearrange the figures as: (left) Radii vs. y_cm;
(middle) lambda vs. y_cm; (right) R^2_out-long vs. y_cm. Put the y-axis label
on the left of each plot;
4) Collision Energy Dependence - 1st bullet: I am not sure that we can
conclude “Shape of pion source changes from oblate to prolate.”, remove it;
5) k_T Dependence - 2nd bullet: What do we mean by 'due to asymmetric
acceptance w.r.t. midrapidity’? Do we mean pion acceptance?
6) For the rapidity dependence, why there is a gap in rapidity in the 3.9 GeV
Au+Au collisions?
7) For uncertainties, do we have both statistical and systematic
uncertainties or only the statistical uncertainties? Please make it clear in
the captions of result plots;
8) Add dashed line in the upper panels of the Two-pion correlation functions
figure.
With those implemented, I sign off.
Best regards,
Nu
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 11:55 PM, Vinh Luong via Star-cf-l
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear Conveners,
>
> Could you please kindly have a look at this poster?
> Thank you very much in advance!
>
> Best regards,
> Vinh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:44 PM webmaster--- via Star-cf-l
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Vinh Luong (lbavinh AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a review,
>> please
>> have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66551
>>
>> Deadline: 2024-01-29
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-cf-l mailing list
>> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
-
[Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Vinh Luong for 58th meeting of the PAC for ... submitted for review,
webmaster, 01/11/2024
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Vinh Luong for 58th meeting of the PAC for ... submitted for review,
Vinh Luong, 01/17/2024
- Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Vinh Luong for 58th meeting of the PAC for ... submitted for review, Nu Xu, 01/17/2024
- Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Vinh Luong for 58th meeting of the PAC for ... submitted for review, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk, 01/17/2024
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Vinh Luong for 58th meeting of the PAC for ... submitted for review,
Vinh Luong, 01/17/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.