STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>]

Dear Yevheniia and All,

I have no further issues with the presentation, except the reference in the 
up-right plot on slide 43.
After replace it with the correct one, I sign off.

Best regards,
Nu

> On Feb 8, 2024, at 9:01 PM, Eugenia Khyzhniak via Star-cf-l 
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Dear Hanna and Nu,
> 
> I updated my talk according to today's meeting discussion: 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/wwndKhyzhniak_1.pdf
> I also added link to my preliminary plots to the page with all 
> reliminaries: 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/gos/correlations-and-fluctuations-preliminary-plots
> 
> Thank you,
> Yevheniia
> 
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:38 AM Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk via Star-cf-l 
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> Dear Yevheniia,
> 
> Thank you for posting your talk in advance.
> I can’t find your results in our preliminary page:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/gos/correlations-and-fluctuations-preliminary-plots
> 
> We should discuss during next CF PWG preliminary requests to results you 
> intend to show during WWND.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hanna
> 
> Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk
> PhD DSc Eng, Professor
> 
> E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl
> Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)
> 
> Address:
> Warsaw University of Technology
> Faculty of Physics
> Nuclear Physics Division
> Koszykowa 75
> Office: 117b (via 115)
> 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
> 
> 
>> Wiadomość napisana przez Eugenia Khyzhniak via Star-cf-l 
>> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 05.02.2024, o godz. 04:56:
>> 
>> Dear Nu,
>> 
>> I've updated my slides: 
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/wwndKhyzhniak.pdf
>> 
>> >lide 42 - Summary - 4th and last bullet: (i) The ‘good agreement’ between 
>> >data and the UrQMD calculation is reached only for '7.7 Au+Au collisions, 
>> >30-50% centrality, from the SL correlation'. It is not the case, for 
>> >example see slide 41, for 10-30% collision centrality. Please add these 
>> >conditions to the bullet;
>> I tried to clarify what I meant in my updated summary slide. Please take a 
>> look.
>> 
>> >Why it is important to observe the consistence between the HBT result 
>> >from the pair measurement and “the tilt from the freeze-out distribution” 
>> >from single particles, at k_T = 0? 
>> I'm looking for the correspondence between HBT results and freeze-out (FO) 
>> distribution of pions, but I'm not claiming that those have to be the 
>> same. This is more like a test. I'm extrapolating my HBT tilt to zero kT 
>> in order to get the biggest possible homogeneity region and trying to see 
>> if the HBT tilt agrees with the same from FO dist.
>> 
>> >slide 42 - 2nd bullet - up-right figure: Where did you find the data 
>> >points from low collision energies? In the listed reference, I could not 
>> >see the experimental data points.
>> You're right, thanks! I mixed it up with another PLB paper from 2000. I've 
>> put the right one now. Please take a look.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Yevheniia
>> 
>> On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 8:17 PM Nu Xu via Star-cf-l 
>> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> Dear Yevheniia and All,
>> 
>> Here are my suggestions/questions about the draft of your WWND2024 talk:
>> 
>> 1) slide 42 - Summary - 4th and last bullet: (i) The ‘good agreement’ 
>> between data and the UrQMD calculation is reached only for '7.7 Au+Au 
>> collisions, 30-50% centrality, from the SL correlation'. It is not the 
>> case, for example see slide 41, for 10-30% collision centrality. Please 
>> add these conditions to the bullet; (ii) Why it is important to observe 
>> the consistence between the HBT result from the pair measurement and “the 
>> tilt from the freeze-out distribution” from single particles, at k_T = 0? 
>> 
>> 2) slide 42 - 2nd bullet - up-right figure: Where did you find the data 
>> points from low collision energies? In the listed reference, I could not 
>> see the experimental data points.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Nu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Feb 4, 2024, at 2:36 PM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l 
>> > <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>> > 
>> > Yevheniia Khyzhniak (eugenia.sh.el AT gmail.com) has submitted a material 
>> > for a  
>> > review, please have a look:
>> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66727
>> > 
>> > Deadline: 2024-02-11
>> > ---
>> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
>> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Star-cf-l mailing list
>> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-cf-l mailing list
>> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-cf-l mailing list
>> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l