star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

[Star-cf-l] Some more questions on your talk today

From: EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
To: "fuchuan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn" <fuchuan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>
Cc: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Star-cf-l] Some more questions on your talk today
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:23:38 +0000

Dear Chuan
On Fig.4 in your slide 14 from today, the experimental data and
UrQMD are now comparable, which were not really the case in your
previous presentation (sorry, if I’m wrong), so I first like to know what
has changed. I would also like to understand why RMS is quite different
(especially for p-p system), although it would give the true geometry
with expanding kinematics, if we apply the same kinematic cuts as
for the correlation and L.L.-fitting analysis. Thank you very much for
the very nice analysis and results.
Best regards, ShinIchi

PS : Sorry for asking the same question, the Rg is given by
single track, so do you take average of both p and Lambda
with natural ratio in the UrQMD for p-Lambda system?

[Star-cf-l] Some more questions on your talk today, EsumiShinIchi, 03/19/2024
- Re: [Star-cf-l] Some more questions on your talk today, 傅川, 03/20/2024