STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>]

Hi Ke and All,

I guess that I over looked the abstract. If fact, I do not know where to see 
these kind of messages.
In any case, here are my suggestions on the abstract:

1) line 12: Based on the natural of interactions, I would suggest we group 
the correlation functions into two: (i) Without strangeness: pp, pd, dd; and 
(ii) With strangeness: pL, pXi-, dL;

2) line 13: remove ‘and others’ as such statement is wired in any abstract. 
Or if you know exactly what you mean in ‘others’, simply spell them out;

3) At the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, add something like: “During the 2nd 
phase RHIC beam energy scan,  in addition to its collider program,  a 
systematic measurements on collision energy dependence, with the fixed-target 
program, has been made by the STAR experiment.”;

4) At the end of the abstract, add: “ Extracted source size parameters, 
driven by collision dynamics, and the FSI parameters, determined by the 
natural of the pair of the particles understudy,  will be discussed within 
the frame work of lattice calculations (interaction potentials) and hadronic 
transport model calculations.” or something like this. This is necessary as 
it echos the physics outlined in the first paragraph of the abstract. 

Hope these are helpful.

Nu

> On Aug 12, 2024, at 5:55 AM, K.Mi (via star-cf-l Mailing List) 
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Dear conveners,
> 
> I submitted an abstract for the WPCF2024 workshop, but seems like the 
> ‘webmater AT star.bnl.gov” didn’t have a response. This is an invited talk 
> about ‘Baryon correlation at STAR'. Please kindly review the abstract under 
> the below link: 
> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/WPCF-2024/Recent-Results-Baryon-Correlations-RHIC-STAR-1
> 
> Any comments or suggestions are welcome. 
> 
> Thank you. 
> Best regards,
> Ke