STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[webmaster AT star.bnl.gov]

Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Nu Xu ( nxu AT lbl.gov ) has commented on a material originally submitted by  
Rutik Manikandhan ( manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/FAIRness-2024/Recent-Highlights-STAR-Experiment-0

Comment:
Hi Rutik, below are my suggestions/questions about your talk  
FAIRNess2024_ver0.pdf:
1)S3-last bullet: ==> "CBM experiment at FAIR extends ...";
2) S10-1st bullet: remove 'consistent with model expectation with a Critical  
Point' as there is no calculations yet;
3) S13: I am not sure that I understand the title of the slide 'Centrality  
resolution ...'? I suggest remove the slide as the next one is the same;
4) S14 - point 2: weak effect of the centrality resolution is on for "C4/C2  
from centrality collisions". Please make it clear;
5) S15: this shows the BES-I data, not needed;
6) S23-27: add reference for these slides;
7) S28 - 2nd bullet: I am not sure we can claim the 'qualitative agreements  
with factorial cumulants for critical signatures'. Remove it;
8) S32-35: Those discussions seem not used in later discussions, why do we  
need them?
9) S37: (i) based on what we can claim '200 GeV partially thermalized'?  What 
 
do we mean by 'partially thermalization'? (ii) Given the large differences  
between dat aand UrQMD result in the RHIC enregy region, how can we conclude  
'UrQMD underpredicts data consistently at all energies'?
10) S39: I am not sure what is the point of discussion for this slide;
11) S40: what is the conclusion of the slide?
12) S42-last bullet: What do we want to say with this bullet?

That is all for now.
Regards,
Nu


---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov