Star-dilepton-l mailing list

["Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>]

Hello Zhangbu

My talk is a privately invited one. 

Personally, I am fine to show the temperature from either range. However, I am a bit uneasy to show the one from a theorist that we have not verified yet, as I understand from Zaochen "At least, this source should be better/more official than that from theorist". Furthermore, Tetyana showed me a presentation from Xiaofeng (sorry, I could not find the link) in Aug. 2022 where the highest temperature she obtained was 233 MeV. This adds more questions to Bernt's number, I think. 

The number "205 MeV" is at least in a proceeding by the NA60 collaboration, even though it is also not published in a peer-reviewed journal. But this seems to be the most trust-worthy one at the moment. 

I just have a chat with Zaochen. The plan is that I will show the figure with 205 MeV. I will list the 230 MeV from NA60, pointing out that one gets different values when fitting different ranges. 

Best

Rongrong

On Mar 30, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Xu, Zhangbu <xzb AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi, Rongrong: 

 

Is your talk a STAR talk or is a personal talk? 

 

You can probably do whatever you want if it is a personal talk.

If it is a STAR talk, I would say that you should not do that just 
a few hours before the talk. 

 

Thanks! 

Zhangbu 

 

From: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>
Date: Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 1:52 PM
To: "zy35 AT rice.edu" <zy35 AT rice.edu>
Cc: "Xu, Zhangbu" <xzb AT bnl.gov>, "Galatyuk, Tetyana Prof. Dr." <T.Galatyuk AT gsi.de>, "Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: NA60 IMR temperature

 

Hello Zaochen

 

Thanks for the feedback. Glad to hear that you are enjoying DIS. 

 

It will be great if you can summarize those studies. Practically, my talk is in about 14 hours. If that's not the timescale you plan to follow, I will revert back to the version shown at QM, i.e. using 205 MeV. Please let me know if you have any suggestions. 

 

Best

Rongrong

On Mar 30, 2023, at 12:06 PM, Zaochen Ye <zy35 AT rice.edu> wrote:

 

Hi Rongrong and Tetyana,

 

Thanks for forwarding the feedback from NA60 collaborators during HP. I’m very happy to see that the have presented the IMR T = 230 +/- 10 MeV for mass (1.1-2.4) GeV. I tried to find this value from NA60 talks and publications for a long time but could not find it. At least, this source should be better/more official than that from theorist, unfortunately NA60 did not officially publish it.

For the NA60 IMR temperature extraction, I also did some exercises a long time ago, I will summarize them in a few slides and add into our analysis note later (I have marked many interesting talks at DIS I don’t want to miss :) ).

 

Thanks,

Zaochen

On Mar 30, 2023, at 11:15 AM, Xu, Zhangbu <xzb AT bnl.gov> wrote:

use