STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Jiangyong,
  Nice abstract. This is a very promising but challenging analysis. I 
agree with ShinIchi on following up a few things regarding the analysis, 
in particular a closure test to demonstrate the efficiency correction 
works for higher order moments of pt-fluctuations and vn-pT correlation. 
It is essential since Gary has been arguing for a long time that 
correction of <pT> fluctuations is challenging & does not work -- let's 
get make sure we resolve this (what he did vs. what's new that we're 
doing now) before showing the results outside.

Following are my comments, with these includes I sign off your abstract.

ubiqutous phonomina --> ubiquitous phenomenon

for atomic nuclei --> for most nuclei

everywhere change: "beween" --> "between"

the deformation has quadrupole shape --> the deformation has a 
quadrupole shape

with axial and reflection symmetry --> that is axially and refection 
symmetric

Collisions of deformed nucleus leads --> Collisions of deformed nucleus 
lead

Significant differences between mean, --> Significant differences for 
mean,
"between" is repeated in the sentence.

sknewness --> skewness

is used to provide a first estimate of the deformation parameter -->
"can be used to provide direct experimental constraints on β for Uranium 
nuclei"
or
"provides novel ways to constrain β for Uranium nuclei in heavy ion 
collisions"

Somewhere it would be good to mention "we compare to state-of-the-art 
model calculations".

Best,
Prithwish




On 2020-09-22 17:55, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Hi Shinichi,
>
> Chunjian will request preliminary for his DNP meeting talk,  this
> abstract is based on what will be shown in that DNP talk.
>
> The efficiency has been applied in the analysis. The momentum
> resolution effect should be partially accounted for efficiency
> correction.
>
> But we could further check momentum resolution effect with existing
> embedding sample later.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jiangyong
>
> On 9/22/20 3:19 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>
> > Dear Jiangyong
> > I would sign off your nice abstract. Is this based on the results
> > being discussed by Chunjiang in PWG these days? So we would
> > need to make this as preliminary for the meeting. Did we already
> > talk
> > about the effect on the efficiency and/or momentum resolution etc?
> > Did we see any effect coming from the experimental measurement?
> > Can we do anything with embedding? Or some full event simulation?
> > I’m sorry, if we have discussed this in the PWG, I might not
> > remember.
> > Best regards, ShinIchi
> >
> > > On Sep 17, 2020, at 21:39, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
> > > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Jiangyong Jia (jjia AT bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a
> > > review, please
> > > have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52112
> > >
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l