STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[knayak <knayak AT mail.ccnu.edu.cn>]

Dear Prithwish,

Thank you very much for signing off my abstract.

I have implemented your suggestions and the updated draft is uploaded here.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/knayak_PID_DirectedFlow_ver3_0.pdf

Thanks,

With best regards,

Kishora

 Original Message 

Sender: Prithwish Tribedy via Star-bulkcorr-l<star-bulkcorr-l AT lists.bnl.gov>

Recipient: star-bulkcorr-l<star-bulkcorr-l AT lists.bnl.gov>

Date: Saturday, Sep 26, 2020 20:47

Subject: Re: [Star-bulkcorr-l] Abstract: DAEHEP-BRNS 2020

Hello Kishora,
  Thanks for including my suggestions. However, you didn't upload the 
abstract using the STAR portal, so none of us could approve it and send 
it to STAR-talks. Please follow the procedure I mention below:

How to upload your talks/abstract:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/uploding_talks.png

1.Go to :
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/add/starpresentations

2.On the left side, choose :
STAR Contribution

3.Once you see "Create STAR Contribution" on the top,
choose the right "Meeting", put title etc. Then choose "STAR Groups 
Hierarchy: Flow Chirality & Vorticity"

4.Then upload your latest PDF so that we can approve it.



Please include the following additional comments on the latest version 
of your abstract:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/knayak_PID_DirectedFlow_ver2.pdf

"of directed flow (v1)" --> "of the directed flow (v1)"

Before the line starting with "A comprehensive transverse momentum" 
please add:
"We further explore such observations with new measurements."

I suggest the following change:
"enable us to test the coalescence sum rule for better understanding of 
particle production mechanism."
-->
  "enable us to test the number of constituent quark number scaling and 
provide a better understanding of the coalescence mechanism of particle 
production."

"New results" --> "In this talk, new results"

"compared with" --> "compared to"

With these included I sign off your abstract.

Best,
Prithwish




On 2020-09-24 06:33, knayak wrote:
> Dear Prithwish and All,
> 
>  Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.
> 
>  I have implemented and uploaded the updated abstract in the following
> link :
> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/dae-hep-brns-india-2020
> 
> Please find the my reply inline below and let me know your further
> comments
> 
> and/or suggestions.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Kishora
> 
>   Original Message
> 
> Sender: Prithwish Tribedy via
> Star-bulkcorr-l<star-bulkcorr-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Recipient: star-bulkcorr-l<star-bulkcorr-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Date: Wednesday, Sep 23, 2020 02:07
> Subject: Re: [Star-bulkcorr-l] Abstract: DAEHEP-BRNS 2020
> 
> Hello Kishora,
>     Please use the STAR presentation portal to submit your nice
> abstract:
> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/add/starpresentations-meetings
> 
> Please consider the following comments in the next version.
>>>> I have uploaded my abstract by using this link.
> 
> Specific comments on the abstract:
> 
> of QCD matter formed -- > of the QCD matter formed
>>>> Implemented
> 
> change of $v_1$ rapidity slope (d$v_{1}$/dy) --> change of $v_1$ slope
> 
> with rapidity (d$v_{1}$/dy)
>>>> Implemented
> 
> first order phase transtion~[1] --> first order phase transition~[1]
> 
>>>> Implemented
> 
> the d$v_1$/d$y$ distribution of net-proton --> the collisions energy
> dependence of d$v_1$/d$y$ of net-proton
>>>> Implemented
> 
> minimum at 14.5 GeV --> minimum at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=14.5 GeV
> 
>>>> Implemented
> 
> implying the softening of EOS --> implying the possible softening of
> EOS
> 
>>>> Implemented
> 
> pseudorapidity ($\eta$) dependent $v_{1}$ for identified hadrons -->
> rapidity dependent $v_{1}$ for identified hadrons
> 
>>>> Implemented
>  will be compared with model --> will be compared to model
> 
>>>> Implemented
>  These results will be compared with model calculations for physics
> interpretations. --> These results will be compared with model
> calculations.
> 
>>>> Implemented
>  Comments on overall text & the preliminary approval: Are you
> promising any new data, results or studies in this abstract from what
> you have presented at the QM2019:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/STARprelim_BulkCorr016102019.pdf
> If yes, have those results been presented, discussed somewhere and
> require preliminary approval ? If not, do you plan to present it soon?
>>>> I will be focusing on both old (which has shown in the above link,
> before QM)
> 
>     and some new as well i.e 19.6 (BES-I) and 200 GeV. I will be
> presenting the results
> 
>     in the coming weeks in the BulkCorr and proceed towards
> preliminary approval
> 
> Your abstract starts with "double sign change of dv1/dy with energy
> signature of first order phase transition". But then switches to
> "enable
> us to test the coalescence sum rule for better understanding of
> particle
> production mechanism". It is not clear how these two parts are
> connected
> and what is the main goal of this study. Is it to make precision
> studies
> to establish first order phase transition or to understand particle
> production? Please consider revising the texts accordingly.
>>>> My presentation will contain both "signature of first order phase
> transition”
> 
>        part where new data points of 54.4 GeV and with precision
> mesurements from
> 
>       27 GeV will be there. And also the the pT dependent of v1 for
> identified hadrons
> 
>       which will gives us idea about the particle production mechanism
> (mass or baryon,
> 
>       meson dependence) and NCQ scaling test will be there. Hence I
> have kept both
> 
>       parts in the abstract.
> 
> What do you mean by "test the coalescence sum rule"? Please be
> specific
> about what you would like to test and show.
>>>> NCQ scaling (test the coalescence sum rule) of identified hadrons
> at 19.6, 27, 54.4
> 
> and 200 GeV will be shown. Similar to Slide 3, 4 of this link.
> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/STARprelim_BulkCorr016102019.pdf
> 
> You mention 19.6 GeV data. Do you mean BES-II 19.6 GeV data. This
> dataset may NOT be produced before DAE HEP symposium and vetted enough
> 
> -- I suggest we do not promise results on BES-II 19.6 GeV data.
>>>> I will be using the 19.6 GeV  BES-I data for this presentation.
> 
> Best,
> Prithwish
> 
> On 2020-09-21 06:12, knayak via Star-bulkcorr-l wrote:
>> Dear Conveners,
>> 
>>    Here I have uploaded the abstract which I would like to submit in
>> DAE-HEP-BRNS, India, 2020
>> 
>> conference. Please have a look and let me know your suggestions.
>> 
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/knayak/dae-hep-brns-india-2020
>> 
>> Conference: https://www.niser.ac.in/daehep2020/index.php [1] [1]
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> With best regards,
>> 
>> Kishora
>> 
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1]
>> 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.niser.ac.in/daehep2020/index.php__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!XvhHjFqPn6UcU7whCfDcBJBkDoI2MkaVU7e2kc8yNhdQawGIjg14Ui1RxpRgwdpkqrW3fDgUAVg$
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-bulkcorr-l mailing list
>> Star-bulkcorr-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-bulkcorr-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-bulkcorr-l mailing list
> Star-bulkcorr-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-bulkcorr-l
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.niser.ac.in/daehep2020/index.php__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!RvRHmVwbX-Cnw0GR_s5RSBfFoN3PVXq2wOH2JjgrSKSGW8Yc60Ez3D9v8FIYgZS0JWFXVxky$
_______________________________________________
Star-bulkcorr-l mailing list
Star-bulkcorr-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-bulkcorr-l