STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[arkadij71 <arkadij71 AT gmail.com>]

Dear Jiangyong
Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

We implemented your suggestions and change the figure according to your comments -

the update version of proceedings is posted.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/icppa-2020/elliptic-v2-and-triangular-v3-anisotropic-flow-identified-hadrons-star-be-1

We did the detailed comparison for centrality dependence of pt integrated v2 of charged hadrons

with STAR published results from paper with the same set of cuts.
``Inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 - 39 GeV,''
Phys. Rev. C \textbf{86}, 054908 (2012) - the agreement was very good for all points in collision energy.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/v2integralBES.png

if our results are not corrected for pT dependent efficiency - does it mean that the published v2 results were

not corrected as well - or effect is very small ?

Thanks a lot

With best regards

Arkadiy

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:35 PM Jiangyong Jia <jiangyong.jia AT stonybrook.edu> wrote:

On 10/12/20 4:17 PM, arkadij71 wrote:

Dear Jiangyong

Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.
Fig.1. please indicate on figure that left is for v2 and right is for v3
==we updated the Figure 1 according to your suggestions

Fig.2 Are the integral v_n corrected for pT dependent tracking
efficiency? If so please indicate it in the proceedings
== we mentioned in the text that v_n values were not corrected for
pT dependent tracking efficiency

It is a bit misleading to discuss the energy dependence of integral vn since the efficiency correction can change the integrated vn value. This need to be worked out for the final publication.

In this case, I suggest to add a legend on the figure, "not corrected for pT dependent efficiency". Also in the text add a comment that the efficiency is pT dependent but are similar between different beam energy, so is not expected to influence the sqrt(s) trend.

With this implemented, I sign off.

Jiangyong

Fig.5 and Fig.6 right panel are the pT integrated? you might want to put
pT range on the figure. =  we put the pT range for each particle on the figure

the updated version of proceedings can be found at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/icppa-2020/elliptic-v2-and-triangular-v3-anisotropic-flow-identified-hadrons-star-be-1

With best regards
arkadiy

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 8:15 PM Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Akardij

Here is comments on the nice proceedings. It is well written and  the
results look great.

My a few comments are on the figures.

Fig.1. please indicate on figure that left is for v2 and right is for v3

Fig.2 Are the integral v_n corrected for pT dependent tracking
efficiency? If so please indicate it in the proceedings

Fig.5 and Fig.6 right panel are the pT integrated? you might want to put
pT range on the figure.


Jiangyong




On 10/8/20 9:13 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Arkadiy Taranenko (arkadij AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a 
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52310
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l


_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l