star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review
- From: Chun-Jian Zhang <chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu>
- To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT icloud.com>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 23:14:10 -0400
Dear Prithwish and Shinlchi,
Hello. Thank you for your nice comments. I really appreciated.
By considering your nice suggestions, I modified my poster. Please find them in the same node at https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/AGS_Poster_STAR_SBU_chunjianzhang_v1.pdf
Best regards,
Chunjian
On Oct 17, 2020, at 9:29 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:Dear Chunjiang_______________________________________________I sign off your nice poster with a one minor comment.For the "size-flow” transmutation in your Result title, I would say “shape - flow” transmutationas you mentioned in the Summary and/or it would also tell us about “radial - anisotropic flow correlation”.Best regards, ShinIchiOn Oct 18, 2020, at 7:00, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:Dear Chunjian,
Very nice poster! Please consider the following comments -- with these included I sign off your poster.
Logo of funding & support:
I think you need to add DOE logo saying "partially supported by" and your institution logo somewhere.
Title:
"flow-mean transverse momentum correlation"
-->
"flow & mean transverse momentum correlation"
or
"correlation between flow & mean transverse momentum"
Motivation:
"Shape-flow transmutation"
-->
"Shape-flow transmutation in deformed nuclear collisions"
It seems the left cartoon is only valid for prolate shape nuclei right ? Oblate nuclei will have opposite shape-flow correlation. So, maybe we should say "prolate-nuclei" somewhere.
Normally the equation you wrote for nuclear density should have a general form that contains β4 which is non-zero for Uranium. If you write this, you should say "leading form of nuclear density".
"A large uncertainty in the well-deformed 238U deformation value"
-->
"A large uncertainty in the β2 parameter of highly deformed 238U"
We had some discussions during the PWG meeting about the right plot of v2{4}. Be prepared
to clarify the connection between this plot and deformation.
Observables:
I think somewhere here you should say something about the dataset and detector you used: "STAR data for Au+Au 200 GeV from year 2011, and U+U 193 GeV from year 2012 and TPC detector".
Change "<(p_T>)" --> "<(p_T)>" where the black arrow is pointed
It is not clear what acceptance is used for the estimation of <pT> in case of
"2-subevent" "3-subevent", can you modify this accordingly ?
Results:
"v2-pT correlation demonstrates size-flow transmutation"
-->
"v2-pT correlation demonstrates shape-flow transmutation"
"TRENTo can reproduce data quantitively"
-->
"TRENTo can reproduce data quantitatively"
"Subevent calculation could decrease non-flow contributions"
-->
"Subevent calculations indicate decrease of non-flow contributions"
or
"Subevent calculations hint decrease of non-flow contributions"
"IP-Glasma Hydro"
-->
"IP-Glasma + Hydro" or "Hydro with IP-Glasma initial conditions"
Reference to "TRENTO" & "IP-Glasma" models need citations, I suggest you add the following somewhere:
"Theory predictions are based on:
TRENTO: Giuliano Giacalone, Phys.Rev.C 102 (2020) 2, 024901
IP-Glasma: Schenke, Shen, Tribedy, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020), 044905"
Summary:
"We presented a clear shape – flow transmutation."
-->
"We presented measurements from STAR that demonstrate a clear shape – flow transmutation"
"Subevent methods is consistent with standard methods and also could decrease"
-->
"Subevent results are consistent with that from the standard method and indicate decrease in"
Maybe add a line in the Summary:
"These measurements provide novel ways to constrain nuclear deformation in heavy-ion collisions"
Best,
Prithwish
On 2020-10-14 11:54, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,_______________________________________________
ChunJian Zhang (zhangchunjian AT sinap.ac.cn) has submitted a material for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52366
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
[Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review,
webmaster, 10/14/2020
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review,
Prithwish Tribedy, 10/17/2020
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review,
ShinIchi Esumi, 10/17/2020
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review, Chun-Jian Zhang, 10/17/2020
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review,
ShinIchi Esumi, 10/17/2020
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for AUM 2020 submitted for review,
Prithwish Tribedy, 10/17/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.