Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Brian Chan for DNP 2020 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Brian Chan <brianchan40 AT physics.ucla.edu>
  • To: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Brian Chan for DNP 2020 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:46:14 -0700

Hi Jiangyong and Prithwish,

Thank you so much for your comments! I have incorporated them into the presentation and uploaded a new version.

Thanks,

Brian

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 8:05 PM Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Brian,
   Please find my comments on your nice slides. With these included I
sign off.

General:
Just to clarify, you are not going to show any new STAR data in this
talk, right. You only have either AMPT results (or comparison of
published STAR data to AMPT) to establish the methodology. It is
perfectly ok. But in that case maybe I would change the title a bit to
something like:
"Methods for studying Λ-p azimuthal correlation..."

Also, in your content slides you should make it clear that this is a
feasibility study and similar analysis with STAR data is ongoing.

Title:
"w.r.t" --> "with respect to"

Slide#3:
"Magnetic field + Chirality"
-->
"Magnetic field + Chirality imbalance"
or
"Magnetic field + net-Chirality"

Slide#4:
I would replace "Fancy Effects" with something like "Exotic Effects" or
"Novel Phenomena"

Slide#7:
You need to mention which detectors you plan to use for: identifying
tracks, centrality selection, pile-up rejection and one for event plane
measurement.

Slide#8:
"Centrality-Dependent"
-->
"We apply centrality dependent quality cuts"

Slide#9:
Is this invariant mass distribution obtained from data? If yes, please
add STAR preliminary.

Slide#11-13: You need to add at least one comment on these slides

Summary:
I would bring the line "Methodology has been tested with AMPT" above and
as a separate bullet.

Best,
Prithwish



On 2020-10-14 14:45, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Brian Chan (brianchan40 AT physics.ucla.edu) has submitted a material for
> a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52370
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page