STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Chunjiang,
  Nice slides, actually you already have included many comments from my 
side during the approval of your poster. I have a few more comments on 
your talk -- with the following included I sign off.

General comment: I suggest you make the following change everywhere.
 "IP-Glasma-Hydro"-->"IP-Glasma+Hydro"

slide#3:
"used a baseline"
-->
"used as baseline"

slide#4:
small typo and hard to see but pls. correct it:
< ( p_T > ) --> < ( p_T) >

slide#5:
"Track efficiency is corrected from"
-->
"Tracking efficiency is estimated from"
or
"Tracking efficiency correction applied using"

slide#6:
"After adding the statistical fluctuations"
-->
"After incorporating the statistical fluctuations due to finite 
multiplicity"

slide#6:
I am confused by the table, the label is "TPC centrality" and then you 
quote the number for slope and in percent?

slide#8:
"they are consistent in"
-->
"they are consistent for"

slide#8:
"indicating the deformation"
-->
"indicating the effect of deformation"

slide#9:
"An hierarchy behavior"
-->
"A hierarchical behavior"

slide#9:
You can confirm from Bjoern about the proper citation but I think it's:
"private calculation provided by Bjoern Schenke"
-->
"private communication, Schenke et. al. (based on Phys. Rev. C 102, 
(2020) 044905)"

slide#10 title and backup slide title:
"Pearson coefficient \rho(vn^2,[pT]) is not affected by non-flow"
I don't think this is right.

How about:
"Pearson coefficient \rho(vn^2,[pT]) and effects of non-flow"


slide#10 an backup slide 13:

I don't think this statement is true :
"Standard method is consistent with subevent methods."

How about
"Standard method is consistent with subevent methods at high N_ch"

slide#11:
I think showing two plots of just \rho(v2,pT) side-by-side for two 
different ranges of pT would be better.


conclusion slide:

"Mean pT fluctuation is also intriguing to study nuclear deformation"
-->
"Study of mean pT fluctuation is also an intriguing possibility to probe 
nuclear deformation"

"Precise model comparison"
-->
"Precise data-model comparison"

"collision"
-->
"collisions"


Remove backup slide#14


Best,
Prithwish



























On 2020-10-21 23:42, Chun-Jian Zhang via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Shinlchi,
>
> Hello. Thank you for your nice comments.
>
> I update my slides based on your nice suggestions. Please find in
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/dnp2020/study-uranium-nuclei-deformation-flow-mean-transverse-momentum-correlation-s-0
>
> I also upload my requesting preliminary plot in
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/chunjian/dnp-preliminary-plots
>
> Thank you. Your nice suggestions are really appreciated. I am looking
> forward to your next comments.
>
> Best regards,
> Chunjian
>
> > On Oct 17, 2020, at 11:09 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Chunjiang (and Niseem)
> > After you prepare the preliminary summary page with all your
> > preliminary plots to be linked
> > at special drupal area for the preliminary location with necessary
> > information at :
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/pwg/bulk-correlations/bulkcorr-preliminary-summary
> > then I would approve your talk.
> > Best regards, ShinIchi
> >
> > On Oct 18, 2020, at 11:24, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Chunjiang (and Niseem)
> >
> > I sing-off your nice talk with some comments.
> >
> > P2: You could choose some other (or additional) v2 comparison
> > between AuAu and UU,
> > which would show more global and general trend not just the
> > ultra-central collisions, first?
> >
> > (Also to Niseem) Please have a comparison plot between you and
> > Niseem with the
> > same data set 200GeV AuAu, one with your own choice of analysis cut
> > (especially for
> > delta_eta and sub-event cuts on covariance and two variances) as
> > well as another one
> > with a common set of eta_gap and sub-event cuts for both of the
> > analysis.
> >
> > Best regards, ShinIchi
> >
> > On Oct 15, 2020, at 0:50, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > ChunJian Zhang (zhangchunjian AT sinap.ac.cn) has submitted a material
> > for a
> > review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52365
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l