STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

On 2020-12-08 21:41, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> HI, Prabhupada
>
> Just a few comments on your nice talk.
>
> 1 Please add slide number
>
> 2 slide 9 show the results from EPD and TPC are consistent within 10%.
> Are you quoting that as the systematic uncertainties?
> 3 You do not indicate which method you use for v2 measurement.
>
> 4 slide 10 and 12 should include systetematic uncertatinties for v2
> measurements and for the EP resolution (even if they are small they
> should be included)
>
> Jiangyong
>
>
> On 12/8/20 12:06 AM, pdixit via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > On 2020-12-03 23:13, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a
> > > material for a
> > > review, please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52968
> > >
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > Hi all,
> > This is a gentle reminder to review my presentation. The conference is
> > on 14th December so I would like to request all to give your comments
> > and suggestion early.
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> > Prabhupada Dixit
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Hi Jiangyong,
Thank you so much for your comments and suggestions.
1. I have added the slide number.

2.slide 9 show the results from EPD and TPC are consistent within 10%. 
Are you quoting that as the systematic uncertainties?
- No, we are not quoting that as systematic uncertainty. Those two 
results are from different run and the event plane used there are also 
from different detectors. We have just compared both the results in this 
slide.

3.You do not indicate which method you use for v2 measurement.
- We have used invariant mass method here. I have updated the slide with 
this information.

4. slide 10 and 12 should include systematic uncertainties for v2 
measurements and for the EP resolution (even if they are small they 
should be included)
- The v2 for 54GeV is already STAR Preliminary in QM-19 (by Shaowei Lan) 
which does not have systematic uncertainty. As suggested by Prithwish 
and ShinIchi in FCV-PWG group meeting we are showing that result.
In slide-12 we have also removed systematic error bar from 27GeV since 
we are showing v2 for both the energies side by side this will look odd 
if one has extra systematic error bar and one has not.

link to updated slide: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DAE_HEP_Talk_version_1.pdf
Please suggest if any other changes required.

Thanks and regards
Prabhupada Dixit.