Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "knayak"<knayak AT mail.ccnu.edu.cn>
  • To: "webmaster"<webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>, "Chirality and Vorticity PWG" "<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Prithwish Tribedy"<ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review
  • Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:14:13 +0500

Dear Prithwish,
   Thank you very much for sign off and your comments.
I have implemented your comments and the update draft (ver2) is uploaded in the link.
 https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52962

Please find the reply to your comments inline given below.


Thanks,
With best regards,
Kishora


 Original Message 
Sender: Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Recipient: webmaster<webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Date: Thursday, Dec 10, 2020 09:09
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review

Hello Kishora,
   Your slides are already in good shapes. I sign-off with the following 
comments.

Slide#3: Add details on the sources of systematics and centrality 
determination (try to avoid STAR terminologies).
>>> Implemented
Slide#4: "Understanding initial fluctuations"
I am not sure how much we can learn about "initial fluctuations" from 
the odd v1 measurements. I would change it to:
"Understanding initial state" or "Understanding initial state in 
rapidity direction"
>>> Mofified the sentence
Slide#5: "Particle formation time are" --> "Particle formation time is"
>>> Implemented
Slide#7-10: Why did you choose to show 0.5<|y|<1.0 ?
>>> Mid rapidity (|y|<0.5) v1 vs pT is also similar but the magnitute 
is smaller than far rapidity distribution. So decided to show only one case. 
Slide#7: "Zero crossing for central (0-10%) collisions: pT~1-2 GeV/c" --> "Sign change for central (0-10%) collisions at high pT"
>>> suggestion implemented
Slide#8&9: You put many details on the thermal model -- I think you should put a comment on the results. Even saying "It predicts positive v1 at all pT" or something like that would suffice.
>>> sentence modified
Slide#10: "Shadowing (or absorption)" needs a reference.
>>> reference added
Slide#10: "in all observed" --> "at all observed"
>>> Implemented
Slide#10: "Baryon-meson dependence" --> "Baryon-meson separation"
>>> Implemented
Slide#11: "(NCQ) scaling is observed at low pT" --> "(NCQ) scaling holds best at low mT"
>>> Sentence modified
Slide#12: "low-pT" --> "low-mT" I think.
>>> Implemented
Slide#13: I would add a concise version of bullet no. 3 on slide #8 & #9 where you show the AMPT results.
>>> Sentences are modified
Best, Prithwish On 2020-12-02 07:14, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote: > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members, > > Kishora Nayak (k.nayak1234 AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a > review, > please have a look: > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52962 > > --- > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact > webmaster@www.star.bnl.gov > _______________________________________________ > Star-fcv-l mailing list > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l _______________________________________________ Star-fcv-l mailing list Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l


  • Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review, knayak, 12/10/2020

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page