star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review
- From: "knayak"<knayak AT mail.ccnu.edu.cn>
- To: "webmaster"<webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>, "Chirality and Vorticity PWG" "<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Prithwish Tribedy"<ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:14:13 +0500
Dear Prithwish,
Thank you very much for sign off and your comments.
I have implemented your comments and the update draft (ver2) is uploaded in the link.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52962
Please find the reply to your comments inline given below.
With best regards,
Kishora
Original Message
Sender: Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Recipient: webmaster<webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Date: Thursday, Dec 10, 2020 09:09
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review
Hello Kishora, Your slides are already in good shapes. I sign-off with the following comments. Slide#3: Add details on the sources of systematics and centrality determination (try to avoid STAR terminologies). >>> Implemented
Slide#4: "Understanding initial fluctuations" I am not sure how much we can learn about "initial fluctuations" from the odd v1 measurements. I would change it to: "Understanding initial state" or "Understanding initial state in rapidity direction"
>>> Mofified the sentenceSlide#5: "Particle formation time are" --> "Particle formation time is"
>>> ImplementedSlide#7-10: Why did you choose to show 0.5<|y|<1.0 ?
>>> Mid rapidity (|y|<0.5) v1 vs pT is also similar but the magnitute
is smaller than far rapidity distribution. So decided to show only one case.Slide#7: "Zero crossing for central (0-10%) collisions: pT~1-2 GeV/c" --> "Sign change for central (0-10%) collisions at high pT"
>>> suggestion implementedSlide#8&9: You put many details on the thermal model -- I think you should put a comment on the results. Even saying "It predicts positive v1 at all pT" or something like that would suffice.
>>> sentence modifiedSlide#10: "Shadowing (or absorption)" needs a reference.
>>> reference addedSlide#10: "in all observed" --> "at all observed"
>>> ImplementedSlide#10: "Baryon-meson dependence" --> "Baryon-meson separation"
>>> ImplementedSlide#11: "(NCQ) scaling is observed at low pT" --> "(NCQ) scaling holds best at low mT"
>>> Sentence modifiedSlide#12: "low-pT" --> "low-mT" I think.
>>> ImplementedSlide#13: I would add a concise version of bullet no. 3 on slide #8 & #9 where you show the AMPT results.
>>> Sentences are modifiedBest, Prithwish On 2020-12-02 07:14, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote: > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members, > > Kishora Nayak (k.nayak1234 AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a > review, > please have a look: > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52962 > > --- > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact > webmaster@www.star.bnl.gov > _______________________________________________ > Star-fcv-l mailing list > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l _______________________________________________ Star-fcv-l mailing list Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Kishora Nayak for DAE HEP2020 submitted for review, knayak, 12/10/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.