STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Jiangyong Jia <jiangyong.jia AT stonybrook.edu>]

Hi, Niseem,

Thanks for these plots.

1) your the pT spectra is about x2 higher at 10 GeV. Are you plotting 1/pT dN/dpT or just dN/dpT (both your and PRL)?

This difference probably implies an effect of momentum resolution at high pT, which also probably implies your statistics is x2 too large due to this effect. What it does is it make your v2 error bar appears smaller than it should be.  This need to be followed up later.

2) the dphi plots looks nice. Could you overlay them with 10-20% central data?

cheers,

Jiangyong

On 1/4/21 12:52 AM, Niseem via Star-fcv-l wrote:

    Hi
      Jiangyong,
      
      
      Please find the updated poster at this link,
      
      
      https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53176
      
      
      Please find attached the spectra comparisons for 10-20%
      centrality. This, not a final comparison since I need to run with
      the same cuts as in the STAR publications.
      
      Also, you can find attached the dPhi-plot attached for different
      high pt region for 90% centrality.
      
      
      
      Thanks,
      
      Niseem
      
      
      
      On 1/2/21 6:20 PM, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l wrote:
      
> Hi, Niseem,
>         
>         
>         The poster looks great.   Just a few comments
>         
>         
>         1 Have you done the two checks that were suggested during the
>         
>         preliminary request?  please circulate those to the list.
>         
>         a) Check the pT spectra to make sure the shapes are similar to
>         published
>         
>         one.
>         
>         b) High-pT Dphi correlation function for AuAu and pp region to
>         make sure
>         
>         the shape in dPhi looks reasonable before and after the
>         subtraction.
>         
>         
>         2 It is not clear to me it is useful to put the abstract in the
>         poster,
>         
>         since the poster presents the results and have a conclusion
>         section already
>         
>         
>         3 For system-size result, since you shown things up to 9 GeV, I
>         would
>         
>         remove the x-axis range above 9 GeV
>         
>         
>         4 It would be good to provide some details about the Glauber
>         model you
>         
>         used to calculate the epsilon_2, since the result may depend on
>         the
>         
>         setup of the Glauber
>         
>         
>         Jiangyong
>         
>         On 1/1/21 4:58 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>         
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >           
> >           
> >           Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman (niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com)
> >           has submitted a
> >           
> >           material for a review, please have a look:
> >           
> >           https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53176
> >           
> >           
> >           ---
> >           
> >           If you have any problems with the review process, please
> >           contact
> >           
> >           webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> >           
> >           _______________________________________________
> >           
> >           Star-fcv-l mailing list
> >           
> >           Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >           
> >           https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >           
> >         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         
>         Star-fcv-l mailing list
>         
>         Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>         
>         https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>         
>       
      
      
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l