Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shengli Huang for Initial Stages 2021 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shengli Huang for Initial Stages 2021 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 02:19:49 +0900

Dear Shengli
I would sign off your nice talk as all the data points from STAR has been
shown
in the last QM19, I send you a few comments here. In p10, it would be nice,
if
the line/band style for the hydro v3 could be slightly different from v2
calculation.
In both p11 and p12, black diamond symbol only exist in the legend (for
ATLAS?),
while the diamond points does not exist inside the actual plot… The squares
ARE
from ATLAS, right?
Best regards, ShinIchi

PS : C1-subtraction should be almost same as reference fitting, where the
non-flow
subtraction is done only in terms of the shape, while the template fitting
does in-deed
subtract the fraction of the pair yield when calculating the v2 after the
subtraction, so
the similarity between c1-subt and template-subt does indicate the subtracted
pair
fraction is small for all the cases. The v2 after the subtraction should be
smaller
in c1-subt than in template-subt by definition, which seems to be the case
for 3HeAu
and dAu, while it seems to be opposite in pAu, which I would worry about your
analysis,
which also needs to be clarified before going to the publication in addition
to what
Fuqiang mentioned below.

> On Jan 6, 2021, at 0:44, Wang, Fuqiang via Star-fcv-l
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi, Shengli,
>
> I don't follow the difference between the c1 method and the template
> method. It seems to me that the template method assumes c1 to be zero, so
> isn't it identical to the c1 method? You recently presented the near-side
> jet scaling method, but it's not mentioned in the talk at all. I think that
> would be a viable third method.
>
> I would remove the mentioning of isobar data.
>
> Best regards,
> Fuqiang
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of
>> webmaster---
>> via Star-fcv-l
>> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 11:21 PM
>> To: star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> Subject: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shengli Huang for Initial
>> Stages 2021
>> submitted for review
>>
>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Shengli Huang (shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a material for a
>> review, please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53200
>>
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page