STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Shaowei Lan" <shaoweilan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>]

Dear ShinIchi,

Thank you.

P17, I have set the same symbol but different color for data and UrQMD results for same particle species.

For p12-15, I would like to keep the current style in the presentation. 

Please find the updated version at the link:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/cpod-march-meeting-2021/anisotropic-flow-measurements-identified-particle-star-exper-0

Best regards,

Shaowei

 

------------------ Original ------------------

From:  "ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Date:  Wed, Mar 10, 2021 07:20 PM

To:  "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Subject:  Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shaowei Lan for CPOD March Meeting 2021 submitted for review

 

Dear Shaowei

Thank you and sorry. I meant for the UrQMD comparison plot just for the p17, plots in p12-15

were already good in the previous version as well. I’m very sorry for not being specific. For p17,

if you could choose the same symbol for the same particle species between data and model,

or the same color for the same particle species between data and model would help, or? It’s

now quite hard to find what color to be compared with which symbol...

Best regards, ShinIchi

On Mar 11, 2021, at 11:47, Shaowei Lan <shaoweilan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn> wrote:

Dear ShinIchi,

Thank you for your suggestions and sign-off.

I make some changes to the color of the data and UrQMD In the slide 12, 13, 14, 15

 in order to make the data highlight.

 

About the statistical error on the Minv plot,

the error is invisible because of the large marker size.

I attach the plot in which the marker is smaller, we can see the error bar.

I would like to prefer using the old one in the presentation.

The updated version can be found at the link:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/cpod-march-meeting-2021/anisotropic-flow-measurements-identified-particle-star-exper-0

Thanks and best regards,

Shaowei

 

------------------ Original ------------------

From:  "ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Date:  Wed, Mar 10, 2021 01:04 AM

To:  "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Subject:  Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shaowei Lan for CPOD March Meeting 2021 submitted for review

 

Dear Shaowei
I would also sign off your nice talk.
The data plot are very good, but I would like you to find
a better way to plot the UrQMD comparison figure…
I do not see the statistical error on the Minv plot for phi,
while the point to point variation tells us they should be visible...
Best regards, ShinIchi

> On Mar 8, 2021, at 14:06, Shaowei Lan via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi Jiangyong,
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> > slide12 the ordering of k+ and k- are opposite to the models, can you add some comment on this?
> The UrQMD results with mean-field describe K- v1/v2 results well, but not for K+.
> I have no clear answer.
> The mean-field in UrQMD is baryonic potential (Skyrme-potential).
> It directly affects baryons but is a secondary effect on mesons (production with resonance).
>
> >slide15 During the PWG presentation, there were a suggestion to add the 4.5 GeV data, is it possible?
> Yes, we have added the 4.5 GeV results into the plot.
> Please find the updated version at the same link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/54114
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Shaowei
>
> 
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From:  "Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Date:  Sun, Mar 7, 2021 07:44 PM
> To:  "star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;
> Subject:  Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shaowei Lan for CPOD March Meeting 2021 submitted for review
> 
> Hi, Shaowei,
>
> looks good. I sign off.
>
> slide12 the ordering of k+ and k- are opposite to the models, can you
> add some comment on this?
> slide15 During the PWG presentation, there were a suggestion to add the
> 4.5 GeV data, is it possible?
>
> Cheers,
> Jiangyong
>
> On 3/7/21 8:01 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Shaowei Lan (shaoweilan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a 
> > review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/54114
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

<phi_ks_ld_inv.pdf>