Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: chunjian zhang <czhang.sbu AT gmail.com>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 17:31:13 -0400

Hey Chunjian,
It looks good. So, I'll approve the old link, please do update it when you can.
Best,
Prithwish


On 2021-04-07 13:14, chunjian zhang via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Prithwish,

Hello. Sorry. my sbu email was disabled in these few days. Thank you
for your kind reminder and comments.

I include all your nice comments in
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/APS_2021_czhang_v2_0.pdf

best regards,
chunjian

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:41 PM Somadutta Bhatta
<somadutta.bhatta AT stonybrook.edu> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Date: Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for
APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review
To: <webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov>, STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity
PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>

Hello Chunjian,
Your slides have been shown many times. I sign off with a few
minor
comments.
Slide#4:
"New way to constrain β_2 of uranium at a much shorter time scale
(~10-23s) in heavy-ion collisions."
The part "much shorter time scale" seems a bit odd and
out-of-context
here. Either you remove it or say something on the slide about what
was
done differently in previous experiments.

Slide#5:
Above or before bullets "I" and "II" add something like: "Two topics
of
interest are:" or "Two topics are explored:".

Slide#6:
Define "δp_T".

Slide#7:
I am not sure if it's ok to say "Au+Au: constant". The scaling is
not
perfect.
Maybe we say "Au+Au: nearly constant" or "Au+Au: baseline"

Slide#11:
"• Strong increase of variance, skewness and negative kurtosis in
U+U. "
-->
"• Strong increase of variance, skewness and negative kurtosis
towards
central U+U. "

"studying nuclear structure"
-->
"studying nuclear shape"

"4. Outlooks: isobar collisions could address two questions"
-->
"4. Outlooks: isobar and small system collisions could address two
questions"

Best,
Prithwish

On 2021-04-05 15:48, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

ChunJian Zhang (chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a
material for
a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/54528

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

--

Thanking You,

Yours Sincerely,
Somadutta Bhatta,
Relativistic Heavy Ion Group,
Stony Brook University
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page