star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review
- From: Niseem <niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com>
- To: ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:44:27 -0500
Dear ShinIchi,
As I stated early the AMPT work is published anyone can use it as it's from the paper. If you want I can remake Fig.1 to separate the data from the AMPT.
With that being stated, I expanded my slides to include step-by-step plots from AMPT as well as the scaling factors. I hope this good for the time.
It's okay to ask we all want to understand the physics in a good way :)
See the updated file attached.
Niseem
On 4/16/21 6:44 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Niseem
I understood your situation, one can do limited things in a limited time.
Since you are comparing your data with the AMPT to argue about physics
implication, therefore I would still like to see them (data and model) side
by side
in each step of your analysis, especially you say “S -> S’ -> S” is just the
scaling
on R, which is done separately between them, so I would guess the scaling
factors
are different between them, so the scaling would directly impact on your
comparison.
If you do have everything in your analysis note on the experimental data and
also all
the information on the model in your published paper, you could collect them
all
these necessary plots/tables from the different places to show in one place,
and
try to convince us your data-model comparison is indeed reasonable or not.
Best regards, ShinIchi
On Apr 17, 2021, at 7:06, Niseem via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>_______________________________________________
wrote:
Hi ShinIchi,
For make it clear the slides I sent some slides to answer some of your
points. I'm doing only the 10-30 which I will present in the APS.
AMPT is published and I sent the 2-papers before.
Could you overlay 2 or 4 data sets from p19 in one plot (A),
and show their relation to p20 in (B), then to p21 in (C),
for both data and ampt side-by-side : (A,B,C) 3 plots x 2 case?
and for a few centrality cases and a few q2 selections? : 3 plots x (3+3)this will be found at my slides sent today.
cases?
Maybe also for a few pT windows as you did in p12? : 3 plots x 3 cases?
And also for a few <Ach> window as you did in p16? : 3 plots x 3 cases?
And I would also like to see the analysis stepsI will sent those after the meeting
S -> S’ -> S” for both data and ampt : 3 plots x 3
cases?
No steps we just scale the x-axis the numbers are provided in my slides sent
today.
I hope this help,
Niseem
On 4/16/21 12:59 PM, Niseem via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Hi ShinIchi,_______________________________________________
Thanks for your email!
As you know life is not very start all the time so I do my best to get some
of what you asked for.
Please find attached the plots for 10-30 central Au+Au at 200 GeV. This is
related to what I will show at the APS.
When I have more time (since I'm changing house those days) I will send you
more info as you asked.
Thanks,
Niseem
On 4/16/21 11:23 AM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Niseem
I do not see any of the supporting analysis plots of your results here yet
that you’ve promised…
Best regards, ShinIchi
On Apr 15, 2021, at 17:21, Niseem via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
wrote:
Hi All,
Please find the page for the preliminary-plots at this link,
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/niseem/preliminary-plots-quadrupole-charge-separation
Thanks, Niseem
From: Niseem via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab
Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review
Date: April 15, 2021 16:57:15 JST
To: ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Reply-To: Niseem <niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG"
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Dear ShinIchi,
So sorry I did not see this email before.
I can do that in fast way for the normal R_2. I will need more time to create
all of the requested plots.
I will work on that now and hope to send you some plots very soon.
Thanks,
Niseem
On 4/15/21 2:25 AM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear NiseemOn 4/15/21 3:05 AM, Niseem via Star-fcv-l wrote:
I was hoping at least to see some of the answers to my earlier
questions/requests
(attached below) to your pwg presentation last week before approving your
plots as
preliminary for the APS presentation, but I did not see the answers, maybe
I’ve missed?
I remember you have mentioned that you would be indicating your previous
presentation
and analysis notes for the possible answers that you could point-out. I would
also think
the step-by-step guidance of your analysis and correction procedures would
also be
appreciated and useful in the conference like APS, since people like to see
what you
really did.
Best regards, ShinIchi
From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 7/Apr/2021 Wed. 9:30AM at BNL
Date: April 8, 2021 1:39:00 JST
To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Dear Niseem
Thanks for the correct link in the chat window :
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/niseem/quadrupole-charge-separation-measurements-auau-collisions-implications-chiral-magnetic-w
Thanks for the plots in our backup slides.
Could you overlay 2 or 4 data sets from p19 in one plot (A),
and show their relation to p20 in (B), then to p21 in (C),
for both data and ampt side-by-side : (A,B,C) 3 plots x 2 case?
and for a few centrality cases and a few q2 selections? : 3 plots x (3+3)
cases?
Maybe also for a few pT windows as you did in p12? : 3 plots x 3 cases?
And also for a few <Ach> window as you did in p16? : 3 plots x 3 cases?
And I would also like to see the analysis steps
S -> S’ -> S” for both data and ampt : 3 plots x 3
cases?
Sorry to ask you too much, though.
I would like to see these plots in order to understand the analysis better,
which could also be helpful (or even used) for your APS/DNP talk?
Best regards, ShinIchi
Hi Prithwish,_______________________________________________
Thanks for your nice comments, please find my updated slides at the same link
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/aps-april-meeting-2021/characterization-quadrupole-charge-separation-200-gev-implicati
I did not understand what you mean do i need to say that we do centrality byslide#7 Mention how centrality was done.
cutting on multiplicity?
For the AMPT data I'm using the a published plots which i added reference to
it.
Thanks,
Niseem
On 4/13/21 4:01 PM, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Hello Niseem,_______________________________________________
The slides look good. I have a few comments -- with these included I sign
off.
Since you have new preliminary results please follow the STAR policy of
making a page (if you haven't done so yet). Regarding the model plots, I
would also request you to make the AMPT data available on RCF somewhere.
General comments:
1. I think we need to make a point that this analysis is promising and still
in the exploratory phase as we need more time to explore the sensitivity to
different background scenarios. Maybe some help from the theorists would be
welcome. Also, isobar data may help to establish the efficacy of the
observable. It would be great if you can add a few comments along these lines.
2. Please make sure not only every plot but each panel has a label saying either "STAR
Preliminary" or "AMPT".
3. Put more details about the AMPT model on the slides. In particular, the
version, link to publications wherever applicable.
Specific comments on the slides:
slide#4: "Prior/ongoing" --> "Prior"
"make more discerning" --> "make a discerning"
slide#6: You need to define what "f" (or "f_q") is.
What is the value of "f" on lower right plot ?
slide#7 "Run-11 data" --> "data from year 2011"
Mention how centrality was done.
slide #8:
"The correlator response in " --> "The correlator response to" (this sounds
better)
slide#9: Put the centrality for AMPT on this plot.
Slide#10:
Somewhere on this slide you need to put a quantitative statement. How about:
"Variation of q_2 leading to ~30% variation of v_2 in 10-30% centrality does not
lead to any significant variation of R_{Ψ2}" ?
Slide#11:
Left plot inset requires more labels for x and y axes.
Slide#12:
This is the best place to put the comment on the exploratory nature of this
study and add that more model studies on sensitivity to background underway
after the last bullet.
Best,
Prithwish
On 2021-04-10 15:53, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,_______________________________________________
Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman (niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com) has submitted a
material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/54618
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Attachment:
Niseem_cmw_for_pwg.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review
, (continued)
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, Chun-Jian Zhang, 04/10/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/15/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Prithwish Tribedy, 04/13/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/15/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/15/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
ShinIchi Esumi, 04/16/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/16/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/16/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/16/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, Niseem, 04/16/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/17/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, Niseem, 04/17/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/17/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, Niseem, 04/17/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/17/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, Niseem, 04/17/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/17/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review, Niseem, 04/17/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/16/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/16/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
ShinIchi Esumi, 04/16/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/15/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman for APS April Meeting 2021 submitted for review,
Niseem, 04/15/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.