star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time
- From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 10:59:46 +0900
Dear Jie
Thank you for the quick feedback. If the blue curve (BG) largely depends
on the normalization of like-sign subtraction, you can also show us the v2 of
just the like-sign contribution around the f0 mass region after the normalization,
or you can think of measuring v2 of "blue curve (correlated BG) + normalized
like-sign BG”. Measuring the v2 of pink curve (rho) and of purple curve (f2)
are interesting by its own, but the tail of these peaks as well as the above
BG contributions would affect your measurement, therefore I would like to
see these individual v2 contributions or sum v2 of all other contributions at f0
mass region. Please keep in mind that you can just take the fitted amplitude
of the mass peak to get v2, if you fix the shape of the mass distribution,
or one would need to integrate the proper mass range to get azimuthal
dependence of the yield for v2 extraction, as I think you already do.
I have another question/suggestion, since you have confirmed there is no
strong pT dependence of the mass and width of the f0 peak, did you also
try to see if there is any centrality dependence of the mass/width with
integrating wider pT bin?
For your v2 extraction, you have assumed they are unchanged as a function
of azimuthal angle, which is good to maximize the statistical significance
of the v2 measurements, so I do agree in this direction, but I would also like
to see the following two extreme cases; (a) no assumption on the azimuthal
dependence, (b) constant assumption of mass/width over pT range as well
for further constraint for possible improvement on v2 significance, since you
already do assume centrality and azimuthal independence, right?
What I’m writing here above might be too much for the preliminary in SQM,
so you can consider them for the final publication. Thank you very much
again for the interesting analysis and results.
Best regards, ShinIchi
On May 13, 2021, at 2:48, Jie Zhao <jiezhao1119 AT hotmail.com> wrote:Dear ShinIchi,thanks for your suggestions, certainly we can do it, but if you remember as we discussed during the previous analysis meting,the fit of the blue curve (BG) is largely depends on the normalization, the plot here are also already subtracted the combinatorial background using likesign distribution.the v2 of this blue curve do provides useful information.for the fit on the rho (pink curve), if we have better control on the rho mass, width, and the background, we will also report the rho v2.but as you know, those informations on rho have very large uncertainty, and the background on left and right are very difference, it’s thus very difficult to get a reasonable v2 of rho, and this even true for f2.the advantage of f0 is that the width is smaller compare to rho and f2, and the background is smooth dominated by the left rho and right f0 peak.Thanks and Best regards!Jieand thus we study the Ks for a cross check as you suggested, thanks!
Thanks and Best regards!JieOn May 12, 2021, at 1:45 PM, Jie Zhao <jiezhao1119 AT hotmail.com> wrote:Dear ShinIchi,thanks for your suggestions, certainly we can do it, but if you remember as we discussed during the previous analysis meting,the fit of the blue curve (BG) is largely depends on the normalization, the plot here are also already subtracted the combinatorial background using likesign distribution.the v2 of this blue curve do provides useful information.for the fit on the rho (pink curve), if we have better control on the rho mass, width, and the background, we will also report the rho v2.but as you know, those informations on rho have very large uncertainty, and the background on left and right are very difference, it’s thus very difficult to get a reasonable v2 of rho, and this even true for f2.the advantage of f0 is that the width is smaller compare to rho and f2, and the background is smooth dominated by the left rho and right f0 peak.Thanks and Best regards!JieOn May 12, 2021, at 12:34 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:_______________________________________________Dear JieWhat I meant about combinatorial v2 in your analysis, is aboutthe v2 of pink curve (rho) and v2 of blue curve (BG?) and even forv2 of purple curve (f2) to be compared with your signal v2 of greencurve (f0) signal, that can be extracted from your 5 different fittingpanels (for 5 phi bins) in page 11, that you just need to calculatethe right quantity using the fitted parameters for the exactly samecentrality and pT selections. Or you might need to calculate v2 ofall other contributions (sum of all pink+blue+purple).Best regards, ShinIchiOn May 12, 2021, at 13:44, Jie Zhao <jiezhao1119 AT hotmail.com> wrote:Dear ShinIchi and All,please find my slides for today’s meeting below, thanks!
Thanks and Best regards!JieOn May 10, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Jie Zhao <jiezhao1119 AT hotmail.com> wrote:Dear ShinIchi and All,please also put me on the agenda, i would like to show few slides about the updates on the f0 v2 analysis for SQM, thanks!
Thanks and Best regards!JieOn May 10, 2021, at 11:58 AM, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:Hi ShinIchi,
Can you please also put me on the agenda for a short update on collectivity in photonuclear processes.
Best,
Prithwish
On 2021-05-10 06:38, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:Dear FCV PWG colleagues_______________________________________________
We will have our usual weekly FCV PWG meeting on this Wednesday 12/May/2021
9:30AM in BNL (NY time zone) at our usual time and place. So if you
have anything to
present, please let us know and please post your slide by Tuesday. The
zoom room link,
ID and password are in our usual drupal agenda page below. Please also
keep in mind
that all the preliminary plots should have already been there in the
summary area below,
if it’s not there, please make one and remind us.
Best regards, Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi
Meeting agenda page with zoom link :
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/jjiastar/bulkcorr
Preliminary page :
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/pwg/bulk-correlations/bulkcorr-preliminary-summary
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time
, (continued)
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time, likeliu, 05/10/2021
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Zuowen Liu, 05/10/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time, Zuowen Liu, 05/11/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Zuowen Liu, 05/10/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Prithwish Tribedy, 05/10/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/10/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/12/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time, Prithwish Tribedy, 05/12/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
ShinIchi Esumi, 05/12/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/12/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/12/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time, ShinIchi Esumi, 05/12/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time, Jie Zhao, 05/12/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/12/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/12/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/12/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] FCV PWG meeting on 12/May/2021 Wed 9:30AM in BNL time,
Jie Zhao, 05/10/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.